Abstract
Small rural producers of Mexico City have had to adapt to current economic growth models, as well as to the social restructuring derived from the expansion of the urban area that has brought about a geographical, economic and social imbalance generating problems among them due to the lack of bonds and information flows. Thus, small rural producers have difficulties in their interaction with other economic agents, which affects the innovation processes that originate competitiveness. Therefore the objective of this research was to understand the innovation processes of small rural producers of Mexico City through a systematic approach identifying the relations that arise between system agents and highlighting the role of systemic brokers of innovation. The methodology used is the Soft Systems Methodology. The results show the significance of the intervention of systemic brokers in innovation processes of rural producers to integrate them, to take into account the different perspectives and to establish linkages between the participating actors, in addition to promoting the dialogue and cooperation required for innovations to succeed, and increase their competitiveness.
References
Alonso, A., & Echeverría, J. (2016). ‘¿Qué es la innovación social? El cambio de paradigma y su relación con el Trabajo Social’, Cuadernos de Trabajo Social, 29(2), pp. 163–172. doi: https://doi.org/10.5209/CUTS.51752 .
Arenilla, M., & García, R. (2013). Innovación social. Edited by S. L. Netbiblo.
Bertalanffy, L. (1989). ‘Teoría General de Sistemas Libro’, Teoría general de los sistemas. doi: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.64.075404.
Bonilla, R. (2009). ‘Agricultura y tenencia de la tierra en Milapa Alta. Un lugar de identidad’, Argumentos, 61, pp. 249–282.
Bonilla, R. (2014). ‘Urbanización rural y economía agrícola de sobrevivencia en la Delegación Milpa Alta’, Argumentos, 74, pp. 195–215.
Cadena-Iñiguez, P., Morales-Guerra, M., Berdugo-Rejón, J., Zambada-Martínez, A., Rodríguez-Hernández, R., Ayala-Sánchez, A.,..., Rangel-Quintos, J. (2012). ‘Los pequeños agricultores también pueden...’
Checkland, P. (1999). Soft Systems Methodology: a 30-year retrospective. England: Jonh Wiley & Sons, LTD.
Cloutier, J. (2003). Crises_Et0314.
Comisión Europea (1995). ‘Comisión Europea Libro Verde’, 00.
Conejero Paz, E., & Redondo Lebrero, J. C. (2016). ‘La innovación social desde el ámbito público: Conceptos, experiencias y obstáculos’, Gestión y Análisis de Políticas Públicas, (15), pp. 23–42. doi: https://doi.org/10.24965/gapp.v0i15.10310
Cordero-Salas, P., Chavarría, Echeverri, & Sepúlveda (2003). ‘Cuaderno Técnico N ̊ 23 Territorios Rurales, Competitividad y Desarrollo’.
Córdoba, Gottret, López y Asociados, Montes, Ortega, & Perry (2004). Innovación participativa: experiencias con pequeños productores agrícolas en seis países de América Latina. Serie: Desarrollo Productivo. Santiago de Chile: CEPAL Red de desarrollo agropecuario.
Dinis, A. (2004). ‘Territorial marketing: a useful tool for competitiveness of rural and peripheral areas’, in 44th European Congress of ERSA University of Porto.
Duch, G. J. (1998). ‘Tipologías empíricas de productores agrícolas’.
Echeverría, J. (2008). ‘El manual de Oslo y la Innovación Social’, ARBOR Ciencia, Pensamiento y Cultura. Dimensiones y dinámicas de la transferencia de conocimiento, CLXXXIV(732 (julio-agosto)), pp. 609–618. doi: https://doi.org/10.3989/arbor.2008.i732.210.
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2019 Dolores Juárez Díaz, Ana Lilia Coria Páez, Ricardo Tejeida Padilla