Principal / Authors / Author guidelines
Ingeniería Agrícola y Biosistemas (INAGBI) is an annual scientific journal with continuous publication and bilingual (English and Spanish) edited by the Universidad Autónoma Chapingo (UACh). The INAGBI journal offers agricultural and biosystems engineering professionals a means of disseminating and discussing unpublished research results. Its aim is to disseminate the results of scientific research and technological developments related to biological systems and agricultural engineering.
Manuscripts submitted to the INAGBI journal must address one of the following topics:
The INAGBI journal welcomes manuscripts in Spanish or English as publication is in both languages. Translation is the responsibility of UACh’s Coordinación de Revistas Institucionales (CORI; Coordination of Institutional Journals) and does not generate additional costs for the authors. In this sense, Spanish- and English-speaking authors are invited to send their manuscripts in their native language in order to reduce the editorial processing time. Likewise, the entire manuscript should be written in one language only.
Prior to submitting, authors must send their CV (listing contributions to the topic) along with an abstract of the proposed review paper to the Editor-in-Chief ([protegiendo correo…]) for review.
Authors should consider the following points before starting the process of submitting their manuscript.
Originality: Authors must ensure that they have written completely original works. If they have used the work or phrases of other authors, these must be cited appropriately. Plagiarism can occur in many ways, from self-plagiarism (citing one's own work without the respective reference), presenting someone else's work as one's own, copying or paraphrasing substantial parts of another work (without attribution), and even claiming as one's own the results of research conducted by others. Plagiarism (in all its forms), as well as fraudulent statements, constitutes unethical conduct and is unacceptable in the scientific community and in the editorial process.
Multiple publication: Authors must not submit manuscripts that are the same, or describe essentially the same research, to more than one journal.
Acknowledgement of sources: Appropriate acknowledgment should always be given to the work of other authors.
Authorship of the manuscript: Authorship must be limited to those who contributed significantly to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the research conducted. In addition, all co-authors must have reviewed and approved the manuscript and accepted the submission for publication.
Self-citations and citations unrelated to the topic: Authors should avoid self-citations and citations not related to the main objective of the paper.
For more information on the INAGBI Code of Ethics, please refer to the Editorial Policy section.
Language used should recognize diversity, be sensitive to differences and promote equality. Manuscripts should not make assumptions about any reader’s beliefs, nor should they assume or suggest that one individual is superior to another on the basis of race, gender, culture or any other characteristic. Authors should ensure that the writing is free from bias.
Before submitting your manuscript, authors should review their names and order thereof according to their manuscripts to the paper. Any changes (addition, deletion or reordering) in the list of authors must be made before the manuscript has been accepted, and must be submitted to the journal’s Editor-in-Chief in a special document, with the signatures of all authors involved, indicating the reasons for the changes. The e-mail address for receiving any request is [protegiendo correo…]
Authors must declare any financial or personal relationship with other persons or organizations that may inappropriately influence or bias the outcome of the work. For this purpose, authors must indicate whether there was a conflict of interest and, if any, mention the agreements reached.
Authors should state whether they used AI when writing their manuscript. If so, a description of the technologies used and what was generated with them should be included in the manuscript. If AI was used, authors should consider that :
Currently, the INAGBI journal does not allow the use of generative AI or AI-assisted technologies (such as ChatGPT) by referees and editors in the peer review process, in order to protect the rights of authors and the confidentiality of their research.
Before submitting a manuscript, authors should consult the letter, front page and manuscript formats, as well as the initial review criteria in the supporting material section.
Manuscripts are only received through the Editorial Manager®. All follow-up for the peer review, including the decision of the Editor-in-Chief, is conducted through this manager and communication is maintained exclusively with the corresponding author. Tutorials for the use of this system can be found on the journal's website. If you have any questions or problems with the manager, you may contact us by e-mail at [protegiendo correo…]; the e-mail must include a telephone number where you can be reached.
Before submitting your manuscript to the Editorial Manager®, be sure to have the following documents and information ready.
Upon receipt of the submission, the Editorial Manager® system sends a receipt notification email; subsequently, the manuscript is reviewed in terms of the journal’s subject matter, format (requirements described in this guide for authors) and possible plagiarism. The last is done through iThenticate®. If a submission complies with all requirements, a reference key is assigned and the peer review process described in the Editorial Policy is initiated. Failure to comply with the criteria described in the guide for authors leads to rejection (topic outside the scope of the journal or duplication of content) or to the return of the manuscript for correction before peer review. Observations on the manuscript are sent via e-mail.
Peer review processes and opinions are issued in accordance with the provisions of the Editorial Policysection.
If the manuscript is accepted for publication in the INAGBI journal, an email will be sent to the authors with the decision and, in accordance with the open access and ethics monitoring policies, the letter of copyright transfer of the manuscript will be required, which must contain the signatures of all authors. Individual letters may be sent by each author
It is suggested that you download the manuscript template located in the supporting material section, for its use in the writing and presentation of the manuscript.
Front page
The authors' names should be written after the title and aligned to the left, each on a different line. The name(s) should begin with the first name(s), followed by the last name(s), which if there are two should be joined by a hyphen without spaces. No mention should be made of academic degrees or titles. After each author's name, his or her ORCID should appear in parentheses.
After the names, the affiliation and complete address should be written: institution, street (avenue, road, highway, boulevard, etc.), number, neighborhood or town, city or municipality, state, postal code and country.
In the case of authors with different affiliations, a numerical superscript at the end of each name and at the beginning of the affiliation is used to identify their data. The corresponding author must be identified with the sign * and the phrase “Corresponding author” followed by his/her e-mail address and telephone number.
Manuscript
The manuscript must include the following sections, according to the type of manuscript:
Title
The title of the manuscript should not exceed 15 words, with the first letter in upper case and the rest in lower case, unless the grammatical rules indicate otherwise. If biological organisms that are not common in the agricultural field are mentioned in it, they should be written according to the scientific standard that exists for such a case. If widely known species are mentioned, the scientific name should be included in the keywords and not in the title.
Abstract
It is a synthesis of the manuscript with the most relevant aspects: introduction, objectives, methodology, results, limitations of the study, originality and conclusions, which should be presented separately. It should not include discussion, citations, table calls or figures. It should be no more than 250 words for scientific articles, and 150 words for scientific or technological notes.
Keywords
It is a list of three to five words, simple or compound, not included in the title, that indicate to the reader the topics addressed by the manuscript. They should be written in a separate paragraph immediately after the abstract, in lowercase, separated from each other by commas and with a period at the end of the list. If the title does not include the scientific name(s) of the species(es) under study, it(they) should be included at the beginning of this list.
Introduction
This section states the problems related to the object of study, as well as the “state of the art” of the topic in question, pertinence, originality, relevance, bibliographical background, objectives and working hypotheses; that is, the problem to be addressed must be precisely stated and justified, avoiding generalities.
The background should be based on relevant and recent scientific literature (at least 80 % of the citations should be less than 10 years old). The objectives should clearly specify and delimit the purpose and scope of the study. These should be presented at the end of the introduction. They should coincide with those stated in the abstract and be consistent with the methodology and conclusions.
Materials and methods
This section describes the most relevant and exclusive aspects of the work, allowing other researchers to know how the research was conducted and, in turn, to replicate and corroborate the results. This section should include dates and locations (with geographical coordinates and elevation), factors and levels under study, treatment design, experimental unit and design, sampling schemes, variables evaluated along with their units and method of measurement, materials, equipment (brand, model, country), reagents (brand, country) and techniques used, management of the experiment, and statistical analysis procedures and techniques. If methodologies are used whose description is extensive and can be consulted in a manual or specialized publication, the corresponding citation must be referenced. In case of making modifications to generalized methods, they must be declared.
Results and discussion
This section must include the results obtained or facts observed derived from the application of the methodology in an orderly, complete and concise manner. Tables and figures (drawings, graphs, and photographs, among others) may be presented, which must be cited and placed in the corresponding place within the text. The information in the tables and figures should not be repeated in the text, and must be understood by themselves, without having to resort to the text.
It is necessary to consider the results derived from statistical analysis, for which reference should be made to the existence or not of statistical differences, as well as the measure of risk assumed by the researcher when making such statements (p value, α, or significance level). If appropriate and relevant, the interactions between factors studied should be interpreted in a coherent manner. In addition to measures of central tendency, measures of dispersion, such as the coefficient of variation or standard error, should be included when relevant.
The results obtained must be explained and discussed, as well as their relationship with the hypothesis and objectives, supported by comparing them to results present in the scientific literature related to the subject. It should be considered that it is not enough to present results, but it is mandatory to interpret them and discuss their meaning. Each relevant result should be related to a discussion. Excessive citations of a single idea and discussion of published literature unrelated to its own results should be avoided.
Do not repeat information already presented in the “Materials and methods” section or include text resembling a literature review.
Conclusions
Concisely present the premises derived from the results and discussion; they should not exceed the scope of the results, nor be a summary of them. Conclusions should be in complete agreement with the objectives and hypotheses stated. This section should only include facts verified in the study, so it should not contain hypotheses or speculations. Recommendations should be avoided, unless the objectives have stated this purpose. Tables, figures or references should not be included. It is suggested that the maximum length be 150 words.
Acknowledgments
This section should include acknowledgements of people, institutions, funds and research grants, among others, that have supported or collaborated significantly in the development of the study. To ensure double-blind review, the authors' names should be avoided.
Declaration of conflict of interest
Authors must declare any financial or personal relationship with other people or organizations that could influence or bias the outcome of the research. Examples of potential conflicts of interest include financial (memberships, employment, consultancies, grants or other types of funding, and patent licensing agreements, among others) and non-financial (personal or professional relationships, affiliations, and personal beliefs, among others). In this case, authors must add the following statement and the conflict of interest they wish to declare:
If there are no conflicts of interest, the authors must indicate:
Declaration of the use of AI
In accordance with the Use of AI section, if generative AI or AI-assisted technologies have been used in the scientific writing, this must be stated in this section by means of a brief description; for example:
If generative AI or AI-assisted technologies have not been used, the authors must declare this; for example:
The declaration does not apply to the use of basic tools, such as those used for grammar and spell checking, as well as reference managers.
References
All bibliographical references cited throughout the manuscript must be presented in accordance with APA 7 standards (http://www.apastyle.org). A summary of the APA 7 reference guide can be found on the journal's website. Make sure that all references cited in the text are also present in the reference list (and vice versa). All references must include their DOI (Digital Object Identifier: www.doi.org) or, failing that, the electronic address where the original citation can be consulted.
All references must be from primary sources; references from secondary sources (i.e. cited by) are not accepted under any circumstances. References from theses, brochures, abstracts, conference proceedings, or any other limited-circulation publications are not admitted. Internet citations are not allowed, unless they are related to statistics or yearbooks from official sources, in which case the consultation date must be recorded. References should be current (last 10 years); as far as possible, they should represent 80 % or more of the total sources.
If a reference management program is used, field codes should be deleted before submitting the manuscript:
The title, abstract (250 words), keywords, introduction, acknowledgments, statements, and references should follow the guidelines mentioned above. As for the methodology, it should specify the criteria used for reference searches (analysis period, keywords, databases consulted, among others), as well as the strategy and methods used for the selection and analysis of the reviewed literature.
It is suggested that the discussion and critical analysis of the literature be organized into thematic sections that address the different aspects of the topic. In each of them, the reviewed studies should be compared, contrasted and critically analyzed, and strengths and weaknesses in the existing literature should be identified. The need for current and future research work and, if applicable, technology development and its possible transfer, should be outlined.
Conclusions should be drawn from the discussion of the key points addressed in the article and include recommendations for future research.
General information
The text must be presented in 12-point Tahoma font with 1.5 line spacing (including tables, figures and references) and 2.5 cm margins on all four sides. Each page should be numbered consecutively in the bottom right margin, and line numbers should be placed continuously on the left margin (except for tables and figures) to facilitate the review process.
As far as possible, sentences and paragraphs should be no longer than three and ten lines, respectively; this will help in understanding ideas and translating the text.
Abbreviations
The first time an abbreviation is used in the document, the full meaning should be written out, followed by the abbreviation in parentheses. In subsequent occurrences, only the abbreviation should be used without further explanation. For example, “...the compounds were identified using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)”; thereafter, only HPLC will be used.
Nomenclature
Common names of elements, substances, plants, animals and things should be written in lowercase. Proper names should be written in lowercase, except for the initial(s). Product brand names should not be used, but rather their generic or chemical name.
Chemical names (those that establish the chemical structure of a substance) must be written according to the nomenclature of the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC, http://www.iupac.org/). For example: 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid. If a commercial product is used, the brand name and country of origin must also be indicated.
Scientific names must accompany, in parentheses, the common names of plants and animals the first time they are mentioned; thereafter, they may be omitted. They should be written in italics and consist of a generic epithet (genus), specific epithet (species) and surname(s) of the classifier(s). They should be written in lowercase, except for the initial letter of the genus and the surname(s) of the classifier(s); for example: Persea americana Mill.
Equations and variables
Mathematical formulas must be created using Word's equation editor (Insert → Equation → Insert new equation). All equations must be written aligned to the left, on a separate line and, if required, numbered sequentially in the right margin.
Variables used in the manuscript should be fully defined (name, symbols and units) and as simply as possible. To help distinguish them from units, all variables and mathematical symbols must be written in italics. Within the text, avoid using the equation editor to insert symbols or variables. Instead use the Insert Symbol Tool and format in italics.
Numbers, symbols and units
Arabic numerals must always be used when indicating units and measurements, and when designating numbers from 10 upwards. When whole numbers from zero to nine are mentioned, which are not associated with units, they should be written in letters; for example: "… seven treatments were carried out …" and "…the temperature of the refrigeration chamber was 7 °C…".
The International System of Units (SI) must be used throughout the document. All units must be written in normal text and in linear form; for example: kg·ha-1. For monetary units, pesos (MXN) or dollars (USD) must be used; for example: "…100.00 MXN…" or "…100.00 USD…".
In quantities, a period must be used to separate the integer part from the decimals and a thin space to separate the thousands. For very large or small values, prefixes or scientific notation should be used. Some examples are as follows: "....3.6 MPa was used...", "... with permeability of 1.45 x 10-14 kg·m·s-1·m-2·Pa-1 and thickness of 35 mm…".
In a series of data with the same measurement unit, the values should be listed and the unit placed at the end; for example: 7 and 10 kg; 4, 8, 11 and 13 %; 15, 18 and 22 mg·g-1. Values and their units should always be separated by a space and should never be pluralized, i.e., do not write cms, kgs, etc.
Tables
Before presenting any table, its title should be written in a short and precise manner, starting with the word “Table,” followed by the consecutive Arabic numeral that corresponds to its order of appearance in the text. All tables should be placed immediately after the paragraph where they are mentioned for the first time. The title should be presented in a paragraph of text, not as part of the table; i.e., it should not be placed in a cell.
Tables should only have three main horizontal lines: above or at the beginning of the table, below the column header and below the table. If there are hierarchical concepts in the header row, horizontal line segments may be placed. If another variable or statistic needs to be separated, such as the least significant difference or coefficient of variation, dashed lines are allowed. Vertical lines are not allowed. Tables must be constructed in Word, without using tabs or lines made with the drawing tool. Both tables and equations must be presented in editable format.
Any abbreviation used in the table should be made explicit at the bottom of the table. All tables should be self-explanatory, without the need to refer to the text. Indications of statistical significance, where appropriate, should be indicated with lowercase letters from the beginning of the alphabet (a, b, c, d, ...). Also, a single asterisk (*) can be used for P ≤ 0.05, double asterisk (**) for P ≤ 0.01 or triple asterisk (***) for P ≤ 0.001. Whenever mean comparisons are presented, the minimum significant difference should be included according to the statistical test used, along with the coefficient of variation (the latter if the analysis of variance is not presented). Additionally, if a table with an analysis of variance is presented, please remember that in this table the units should not be placed in the variables.
Some examples of these and other tables can be found in the Manuscript template.
Figures
Figures, like tables, should be placed immediately after the paragraph where they are mentioned for the first time; additionally, they should be attached separately to ensure their quality. At the bottom of each figure, there should be a legend with the word “Figure”, followed by the arabic numeral corresponding to its order of appearance in the text, and a text containing the title and the information necessary to understand it. Figure titles should be included as text, and not be part of the figure. Points, lines or bars representing means in graphs should be accompanied by their standard errors. As with tables, they should be self-explanatory, without the need to refer to the text.
Authors are responsible for ensuring that all images included in their manuscript are their own work or that they have the appropriate written permission for reuse. The use of AI for their construction is not permitted.
Figures must be attached in PNG, TIFF or JPG format, with a minimum size of 945 x 945 pixels and a minimum resolution of 300 pixels per inch (300 dpi). All figures must be grouped, without letters, symbols or lines placed with the drawing tool. If there is a need to do this, the image must be grouped as a single image or saved as an image with the aforementioned characteristics. If the figures contain text, it must be ensured that the text is complete and error-free.
So far, the INAGBI journal does not charge any publication fees. The costs associated with the editing process (such as style correction, translation, design, and metadata tagging) are covered by the UACh (the publishing institution).
It is recommended to consult the Frequently asked questions section. Questions and requested clarifications will be addressed by e-mail: [protegiendo correo…]