ISSN e:2007-4034 / ISSN print: 2007-4034

English | Español

     

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Vol. 27, issue 2 May - August 2021

ISSN: ppub: 1027-152X epub: 2007-4034

Scientific article

Biorational control of Phytophthora capsici in pepper plants using Streptomyces spp.

http://dx.doi.org/10.5154/r.rchsh.2020.06.014

0000-0001-6324-6049 Trinidad-Cruz, Jesús Rafael 1 ; 0000-0001-7594-6077 Rincón-Enríquez, Gabriel 1 ; 0000-0003-3145-0824 Evangelista-Martínez, Zahaed 2 ; 0000-0002-7384-0532 Quiñones-Aguilar, Evangelina Esmeralda 1 *

  • 1Centro de Investigación y Asistencia en Tecnología y Diseño del Estado de Jalisco (CIATEJ). Camino Arenero, núm. 1227, El Bajío del Arenal, Zapopan, Jalisco, C. P. 45019, MÉXICO.
  • 2Centro de Investigación y Asistencia en Tecnología y Diseño del Estado de Jalisco (CIATEJ) - Subsede Sureste. Tablaje Catastral 31264, Carretera Sierra Papacal-Chuburná Puerto km 5.5, Parque Científico y Tecnológico de Yucatán, Mérida, Yucatán, C. P. 97302, MÉXICO.

Corresponding author: eqaguilar08@gmail.com, tel. 333 345 52 00, ext. 1730.

Received: June 03, 2020; Accepted: January 13, 2021

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License view the permissions of this license

Funding:

    Abstract

    Pepper wilt, caused by Phytophthora capsici, is one of the main threats faced during pepper production. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the effect of Streptomyces spp. in the biological control of P. capsici under in vitro and in vivo conditions. The in vitro antagonistic activity of strains ABV38, ABV39 and ABV45 was examined by means of dual confrontation tests. Broth culture supernatant (BCS) from the growth of the strains was irrigated on pepper plants inoculated with P. capsici CH11 (PC CH11) to evaluate wilt suppression. Molecular identification of the strains was carried out by analyzing the partial sequence of the 16S rRNA gene. Under in vitro conditions, strains ABV38, ABV39 and ABV45 inhibited the mycelial growth of PC CH11 by 51, 28 and 50 %, respectively. In the in vivo evaluation, the BCSs of strains ABV38 and ABV45 showed a wilt suppressive effect, with plant survival of 77 and 94 %, respectively. Strain ABV39 did not show a wilt suppressive effect (0 % survival), and nor did the untreated plants. Molecular identification indicated that strains ABV39, ABV38 and ABV45 belong to the genus Streptomyces, of which ABV38 and ABV45 have potential for biorational control of pepper wilt.

    Keywordsactinobacteria; actinomycetes; Capsicum annuum L.; wilt; biological control; oomycete

    Introduction

    Phytophthora species (> 60) are a threat to different agronomically and ecologically important plants, causing diseases such as wilting or rotting of root, crown, stems, leaves and fruits (Drenth & Guest, 2004; Jung et al., 2018). Among these species, Phytophthora capsici (PC) is considered a destructive pathogen that affects agricultural crops such as cucurbits, eggplant (Solanum melongena L.), tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) and pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) (Lamour, Stam, Jupe, & Huitema, 2012). In Mexico, pepper is one of the main horticultural crops of economic importance. In 2018, Mexico ranked as the world’s second largest pepper producer and exporter, producing nearly 3.4 million tons with a value of US $844 million (Servicio de Información Agroalimentaria y Pesquera [SIAP], 2019). Despite the above, diseases due to phytopathogens, such as wilt caused by PC, have affected the productivity of the pepper crop.

    Phytophthora spp. zoospores are the organism’s main propagule for survival, dispersal and infection; moreover, due to their motility, they can actively locate their hosts (Judelson & Blanco, 2005; Stanghellini, Kim, Rasmussen, & Rorabaugh, 1996). The use of chemical fungicides has been the main method of PC control; however, their constant use increases the risk of pathogen resistance (Wu et al., 2020). Therefore, other alternatives are required that, as a whole, allow for an integrated pest and disease management strategy focused on the development of sustainable agriculture (Lamichhane et al., 2017). In recent decades, the use of antagonistic microorganisms for disease control in plants has proven to be an alternative because microorganisms are specific to a phytopathogen, harmless to both non-target species and humans, and environmentally friendly (O’Brien, 2017).

    Actinobacteria (commonly called actinomycetes) have potential as biological control agents, as they have the ability to inhibit or reduce the growth of plant pathogens through direct and indirect mechanisms such as the production of antibiotics, lytic enzymes, hyperparasitism, competition and induction of systemic resistance in plants (Kurth et al., 2014; Sharma & Salwan, 2018). Actinobacteria have demonstrated their in vitro potential as antagonists for different Phytophthora species.

    Sadeghi, Koobaz, Azimi, Karimi, and Akbari (2017) demonstrated that Streptomyces spp. strains inhibit mycelial growth of P. drechsleri by 30 to 78 %. Fonseca-Ardila, Castellanos-Suárez, and León-Sicard (2011) report that actinobacterial isolates from fermented extracts of chipaca (Bidens pilosa L.) inhibit mycelial growth of P. infestans by 33 to 77 %. Arfaoui, Adam, Bezzahou, and Daayf (2018) isolated bacteria (100 isolates) from the rhizoplane of soybean (Glycine max [L.] Merr.) plants and found that nine isolates, belonging to the genera Streptomyces spp. (3), Bacillus spp. (4), Paenibacillus sp. (1) and Lysobacter sp. (1) reduced the percentage of mycelial growth of P. sojae by 14 to 85 %. Chen, Chen, and Tsay (2016) reported the antagonistic activity of S. plicatus B4-7 against several Phytophthora species, and Evangelista-Martínez (2014) demonstrated the antagonistic potential of Streptomyces sp. CA-CIS-1.16CA (isolated from the soil of the "Los Petenes" biosphere reserve) against several phytopathogenic fungi, among them PC.

    Actinobacteria are a prominent source of natural products. According to Bérdy (2012), actinobacteria account for 40.8 % of all bioactive metabolites of microbial origin. Nguyen et al. (2015) demonstrated that pyrrolidone carboxylic acid, isolated from Streptomyces griseus H7602, reduced PC mycelial growth from concentrations of 8 to 128 µg∙mL-1. In similar studies, Joo (2005) and Chen et al. (2016) evaluated the activity of the cell-free culture broth of S. plicatus B4-7 and S. halstedii AJ-7, respectively; in in vitro tests, both cultures inhibited the germination of PC zoospores. Lee, Moon, Yun, Yoo, and Hwang (2004) isolated the natural product thiobutacin from Lechevalieria aerocolonigenes VK-A9, a compound that inhibited the in vitro germination of PC zoospores at a concentration of 10 µg·mL-1. Therefore, the objective of this work was to evaluate the effect of Streptomyces spp. in the biological control of Phytophthora capsici under in vitro and in vivo conditions.

    Materials and methods

    Plant material

    Serrano pepper var. Camino Real F1 seeds (Harris Moran®, Seed Company) were used. The seeds were washed with running water to remove the fungicide coating and then sown in three plastic germination trays with 72 cavities (6×12, one seed per cavity); for this, a sand-peat mixture (Mix No. 3, Sunshine®) was used as substrate at a 1:1 (v/v) ratio and sterilized at 120 °C for 6 h at a pressure of 1.05 kg·cm-2. Each tray was placed inside a base and covered with a transparent plastic dome, then placed in an incubation room at 21 ± 1 °C with a photoperiod of 16/8 h (light / dark). Irrigation was carried out with running water once a week.

    Microbiological material

    Actinobacteria from the microorganism collection of the Phytopathology Laboratory of the CIATEJ Plant Biotechnology Unit were used. The actinobacteria used were ABV38, ABV39 and ABV45, previously isolated from the rhizosphere of Agave spp. (Rincón-Enríquez, López-Pérez, & Quiñones-Aguilar, 2014). In previous tests, these actinobacteria inhibited the in vitro growth of Phytophthora capsici CH11 (PC CH11) (Reyes-Tena, Fernández-Pavia, Rincón-Enríquez, López-Pérez, & Quiñones-Aguilar, 2014). Actinobacterial isolates were grown in potato-dextrose agar (PDA) culture medium with pH 7 (3 M NaOH) and were incubated at 21 ± 1 °C in the dark for 15 days. The PC CH11 strain was cultured in clarified V8 agar (50 mL·L-1 of V8 juice, 0.5 g·L-1 of CaCO3 and 15 g·L-1 of agar) and incubated at 21 ± 1 °C in the dark for 10 days.

    Dual antagonistic activity bioassay

    Actinobacteria ABV38, ABV39 and ABV45 were tested to determine their activity in inhibiting in vitro growth of PC CH11 in dual confrontation assays. A disk containing a 6 mm diameter actinobacterial isolate with 15 days of growth was deposited 1 cm from the edge of the Petri dish with PDA culture medium. The Petri dishes were pre-incubated before inoculating the phytopathogenic oomycete for 0, 3 and 5 days at 21 ± 1 °C in the dark (Evangelista-Martinez, 2014). After the pre-incubation time, a 6 mm diameter PC CH11 disk (10 days of growth) was deposited 1 cm from the edge of the Petri dish and opposite the disk with actinobacteria. Dishes inoculated only with PC CH11 at 1 cm from the edge served as the control. Antagonistic activity was determined 24 days after inoculation from the area of PC CH11 growth inhibition. PC CH11 growth in the control dishes was over the entire surface of the culture medium. For the evaluation, a completely randomized experimental design with three replicates was established, where three treatments were evaluated per actinobacterium, corresponding to the pre-incubation times (0, 3 and 5 days).

    Production of broth culture supernatant

    One disk of each actinobacterium on 6 mm diameter PDA was independently inoculated in 250 mL Erlenmeyer flasks with 125 mL of culture medium (potato-dextrose broth, pH 7) that had been previously sterilized (121 °C at 1.05 kg·cm-2 for 20 min). The flasks were placed in an orbital incubator at 30 °C and 200 rpm for 20 days. Four flasks were inoculated for each actinobacterium. After incubation, the broth culture was centrifuged at 13,000 rpm for 15 min. The broth culture supernatant (BCS) of each actinobacterium (unfiltered) was recovered and stored at 4 °C until use.

    Production of Phytophthora capsici CH11 zoospores

    Zoospore production was performed using the Ristaino (1990) technique, with slight modifications. PC CH11 cultures with 10 days of growth in clarified V8 agar (50 mL·L-1 of V8 juice, 0.5 g·L-1 of CaCO3 and 15 g·L-1 of agar) were used. The culture medium of each Petri dish was cut in half, and one of the halves was placed in another sterile Petri dish. Using a scalpel, the clarified V8 agar halves were cut into ~1 cm2 squares and sterile distilled water was added to cover the agar squares. The Petri dishes were placed in an incubation room at 21 ± 1 °C in the dark. The distilled water was renewed daily for five days. Finally, the Petri dishes were brought to 4 °C for 1 h to induce zoospore release. The suspension was adjusted to 500 zoospores·mL-1 using a hemocytometer.

    Evaluation of biorational control of Phytophthora capsici CH11 in vivo

    Three days before applying the treatments, the serrano pepper plants were irrigated with plenty of running water, and excess water from the base container was removed to avoid cross contamination. Ten mL of the BCS of actinobacteria ABV38, ABV39, and ABV45 were applied independently to each 25-day-old pepper plant. As a negative control, 10 mL of sterile distilled water were applied per plant, and the commercial product Infinito® (Bayer®, Mexico), recommended for the control of oomycetes, which contains fluopicolide (62.5 g·L-1) and propamocarb hydrochloride (625 g·L-1), was used as a chemical control. For the chemical control, a suspension was prepared at 3 mL∙L-1 of the concentrated product and 10 mL were added per plant. After applying the treatments, each plant was inoculated with 3 mL of the zoospore suspension (500 zoospores·mL-1) of PC CH11, at a final concentration in the substrate of 50 zoospores·g-1. The control plants were inoculated with 3 mL of sterile distilled water. After inoculation of the phytopathogenic oomycete, the plants were incubated at 21 ± 1 °C with a photoperiod of 16/8 h (light/dark) for 10 days. No further irrigation was applied to the plants.

    For this test, a completely randomized experimental design with 10 treatments was used: T1) ABV38, T2) ABV38 + PC CH11, T3) ABV39, T4) ABV39 + PC CH11, T5) ABV45, T6) ABV45 + PC CH11, T7) control (healthy plants), T8) control + PC CH11 (diseased plants), T9) chemical control and T10) chemical control + PC CH11. The treatments were applied in trays with the pepper plants. One tray had 12 columns, each with six pepper plants. The end columns of the tray were excluded. The 10 internal columns were randomized to apply the treatments. The experimental unit consisted of six pepper plants, and the treatments were carried out in triplicate. The survival percentage of the plants was determined with the following formula:

    S u r v i v a l   % = 6 - N o .   o f   d e a d   p l a n t s 6 × 100

    Molecular identification of actinobacterium strains

    Actinobacterial isolates ABV38, ABV39 and ABV45 were identified by partial amplification of the 16S rRNA gene by means of polymerase chain reaction (PCR), for which the oligonucleotides fD1 (5’-CCGAATTCGTCGACAACAGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG-3’) and rD1 (5’-CCCGGGATCCAAGCTTAAGGAGGTGATCCAGCC-3’) (Weisburg, Barns, Pelletier, & Lane, 1991) were used. DNA extraction, PCR and sequencing of the amplified fragments were performed at the Biotechnology and Seed Pathology Laboratory of the Colegio de Postgraduados. The amplified fragments were sequenced in both directions using primers 8F, 1492R, U514, 800R, fD1 and rD1 (Edwards, Rogall, Blockerl, Emde, & Bottger, 1989; Stackebrandt & Liesack, 1993).

    Consensus sequences of strains ABV38, ABV39 and ABV45 were compared in the GenBank/EMBL/DDBJ database through the NCBI (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) using the BLAST (Basic Local Alignment Search Tool) program (McGinnis & Madden, 2004). Reference sequences and those of phylogenetically-related strains were used with each actinobacterium. The sequences were aligned with CLUSTAL W (Thompson, Higgins, & Gibson, 1994) and the phylogenetic tree construction was performed by means of the Neighbor-Joining (NJ) method (Saitou & Nei, 1987) with 1,000 Bootstrap replicates using the MEGA-X program (Kumar, Stecher, Li, Knyaz, & Tamura, 2018). The nucleotide substitution model selected for NJ was Kimura-2 parameters (Kimura, 1980). The partial 16S rRNA gene sequences of strains ABV38, ABV39 and ABV45 were deposited in the GenBank database under accession numbers MT435538, MT435539 and MT435540, respectively.

    Statistical analysis

    The response variables (inhibition and survival percentage) were subjected to analysis of variance and Tukey's mean comparison test (P ≤ 0.05), for which the StatGraphics Centurion XV (StatPoint Inc., 2005) statistical package was used. The survival percentage data were transformed with ArcSen√x prior to analysis.

    Results

    In vitro antagonistic activity

    Strains ABV38, ABV39 and ABV45 had different degrees of in vitro growth inhibition of PC CH11 (Figure 1). Pre-incubation (5 days) of strains ABV38, ABV39 and ABV45 showed significant differences (P ≤ 0.05) in PC CH11 growth inhibition (with an increase of 14.9, 10.4 and 9 %, respectively) compared to treatments without pre-incubation (Figure 1). Strain ABV39 showed the lowest reduction (28 %) of PC CH11 mycelial growth at 5 days of pre-incubation, while strains ABV38 and ABV45 had an inhibition percentage of 51 and 50 %, respectively, at the same pre-incubation time (Figure 1 and 2). Results of the in vitro antagonistic activity clearly indicate the potential of strains ABV38 and ABV45 as biological control agents of PC CH11, by presenting significant differences in the inhibition of mycelial growth of this plant pathogen with respect to strain ABV39 at any pre-incubation time (Figure 1 and 2).

    Figure 1. Behavior of the in vitro growth inhibition ability of Phytophthora capsici CH11 by different strains of Streptomyces spp. (mean ± standard deviation). zMeans with the same letter within pre-incubation time (lowercase) or by strains (uppercase) do not differ statistically (Tukey, P ≤ 0.05).

    Figure 2. In vitro antagonistic activity of different strains of Streptomyces spp. against Phytophthora capsici CH11.

    Biorational control of P. capsici CH11 in vivo

    Table 1 presents the survival percentage of serrano pepper plants in the different treatments. Results indicate that the BCS of strains ABV45 (T6; 94 %), ABV38 (T2; 77 %) and the chemical control (T10; 100 %), applied to pepper plants inoculated with PC CH11, showed significant differences in the survival percentage compared to the control (T8; 0 %). Plants treated with the BCS of strain ABV39 (T4; 0 %) did not show a control effect of PC CH11.

    Table 1. Effect of the application of the broth culture supernatant of actinobacterias on the survival percentage of serrano pepper var. Camino Real plants 10 days after inoculation with Phytophthora capsici CH11.

    Treatment Survival (%)
    T1) Streptomyces sp. ABV38 100 az
    T2) Streptomyces sp. ABV38 + P. capsici CH11 77 b
    T3) Streptomyces sp. ABV39 100 a
    T4) Streptomyces sp. ABV39 + P. capsici CH11 0 c
    T5) Streptomyces sp. ABV45 100 a
    T6) Streptomyces sp. ABV45 + P. capsici CH11 94 a
    T7) Control (healhty plants) 100 a
    T8) Control + P. capsici CH11 (diseased plants) 0 c
    T9) Chemical control 100 a
    T10) Chemical control + P. capsici CH11 100 a
    z Means with the same letter do not differ statistically (Tukey, P ≤ 0.05).

    The in vivo experiment showed that applying the BCS of strains ABV38 and ABV45 had a suppressive effect on the wilting of pepper plants caused by PC CH11, while in the control treatment inoculated with PC CH11, severe defoliation and wilting was observed 10 days after inoculation with the phytopathogenic oomycete (Figure 3). The application of the BCS of the actinobacteria did not affect the survival of pepper seedlings not inoculated with PC CH11 (Table 1); however, a decrease in root length was observed due to the application of the broth culture (Figure 3).

    Figure 3. Biorational control of wilt in serrano pepper var. Camino Real plants by actinobacteria 10 days after inoculation with Phytophthora capsici CH11. Bar = 5 cm.

    Molecular identification

    Comparative analysis of the 16S rRNA gene sequences of actinobacterial strains ABV38 (1,404 bp), ABV39 (1,403 bp) and ABV45 (1,231 bp) confirmed that all three strains belong to the genus Streptomyces (Figure 4). Analysis of these sequences indicated that strains ABV38, ABV39 and ABV45 are phylogenetically related to S. thioluteus NBRC 13341 (99.36 %), S. galbus DSM 40480 (99.29 %) and S. cinnamoneus NBRC 15926 (99.76 %), respectively. However, further studies are needed to establish whether strains ABV38, ABV39 and ABV45 represent new species for the genus Streptomyces.

    Figure 4. Neighbor-Joining phylogenetic tree based on partial 16S rRNA gene sequences showing the phylogenetic relationships between strains ABV38, ABV39 and ABV45 with other species of the genus Streptomyces. The numbers beside the branches are Bootstrap values (%). The sequence of Streptosporangium fragile DSM 43847 was used as an outgroup. The accession number of each sequence is shown in parentheses. Bar = 0.01 substitutions per nucleotide position.

    Discussion

    The genus Streptomyces is a potential source of biocontrol agents against Phytophthora spp. (Arfaoui et al., 2018; Sadeghi et al., 2017; Thampi & Bhai, 2017). In the present study, the antagonistic activity of three Streptomyces strains against PC was examined under in vitro and in vivo conditions. Under in vitro conditions, strains ABV38 and ABV45 showed the ability to inhibit mycelial growth of PC CH11 in direct confrontation, whereas strain ABV39 exhibited weak activity. Secondary metabolites with antioomycete activity could be involved in mechanisms inhibiting PC mycelial growth.

    Chen et al. (2016) report that the fermented broth of S. plicatus B4-7 (cell-free) cultured in oatmeal broth inhibited mycelial growth of P. capsici, P. cinnamomi, P. palmivora, and P. parasitica by 55, 65, 43.8, and 35 %, respectively. Yang, Zhang, and Li (2019) note that metabolites from the ethanolic extract of the fermented broth of S. corchorusii AUH-1 inhibited the mycelial growth of P. capsici and P. parasitica var. nicotianae by 67.2 and 78.9 %, respectively. In this study, Streptomyces sp. ABV38 and ABV45 exhibited inhibition percentages of 51 and 50 %, respectively, on PC mycelial growth. However, further studies are required to determine which metabolite(s) are involved in the inhibition of P. capsici and their mode of action.

    During in vivo evaluation of the BCS of strains ABV38 and ABV45, applied to pepper plants, the broth showed a suppressive effect on wilt caused by PC CH11. In studies with Streptomyces spp., Nguyen et al. (2012) showed that the culture supernatant of S. griseus H7602 reduced the wilt of pepper roots inoculated with PC, and in subsequent studies they demonstrated that the antioomycete activity was due to pyrrolidone carboxylic acid (Nguyen et al., 2015). Chen et al. (2016) demonstrated that the fermented broth obtained from the growth of S. plicatus B4-7 completely inhibited in vitro germination of PC zoospores and reduced crown rot disease by 75 % in bell pepper plants inoculated with PC zoospores. In this case, the compound purified from the culture broth with the highest antioomycete activity was borrelidin. Sellem et al. (2017) found that the supernatant from the lyophilized culture of Streptomyces sp. TN258 completely inhibited the germination of P. ultimum oospores at a concentration of 12.5 mg·mL-1.

    Regarding secondary metabolites, Lee, Sherman, and Hwang (2008) found that thiobutacin, isolated from L. aerocolonigenes VK-A9, exhibited the lysis of PC zoospores. Islam, Laatsch, and von Tiedemann (2016) observed the zoosporicidal activity of macrotetrolide dinactin isolated from Streptomyces sp., as it halted motility and caused the subsequent lysis of zoospores of both P. capsici and the phytopathogenic oomycete Plasmopara viticola. Abdalla et al. (2011) isolated and purified compounds from the culture broth of Streptomyces sp. ANK313, a new one (khatmiamycin) and others already known, which inhibited motility and caused lysis of P. viticola zoospores.

    In this study, the BCS of Streptomyces sp. strains ABV38 and ABV45 suppressed wilt of pepper plants when inoculated with PC CH11 zoospores. In vivo test results suggest that secondary metabolites of BCSs could be involved in controlling the disease by acting directly against zoospores. Further studies are needed to identify which BCS compound(s) are involved in suppressing wilt caused by PC.

    On the other hand, the commercial product Infinito®, used as a chemical control, exhibited 100 % control over PC CH11 as the pepper plants showed no evidence of wilt 10 days after inoculation. In in vitro studies, fluopicolide and propamocarb hydrochloride have been shown to have an effect on the reduction of mycelial growth, sporangium formation, zoospore motility and germination at different stages of Phytophthora spp. development (Hu, Hong, Stromberg, & Moorman, 2007; Toquin, Latorse, & Beffa, 2019).

    Although the BC of Streptomyces sp. ABV39 did not exhibit a wilt-suppressing effect on PC CH11, in previous studies, co-inoculation of poblano pepper plants with Streptomyces sp. ABV39 spores and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi reduced wilt severity relative to the PC-inoculated control (Reyes-Tena, Rincón-Enríquez, López-Pérez, & Quiñones-Aguilar, 2017). The results suggest that Streptomyces sp. ABV39 is not useful for biorational control of PC; however, it could be used as a biocontrol agent.

    Conclusions

    Streptomyces sp. strains ABV38, ABV39 and ABV45 showed different degrees of control over in vitro growth of P. capsici CH11 depending on incubation time. The 5-day pre-incubation of the three strains significantly increased the growth inhibition of P. capsici CH11. In vivo evaluation showed biorational control of the culture supernatant of strains ABV38 and ABV45 in the suppression of wilt caused by P. capsici CH11 in pepper plants under controlled conditions. Molecular identification of strains ABV38, ABV39 and ABV45 indicated that they belong to the genus Streptomyces. Overall, strains ABV38 and ABV45 have potential for biorational control of pepper wilt.

    Acknowledgements

    • The authors thank the Joint CONACYT-Government of the State of Aguascalientes Fund for funding the project entitled "Development of a technology for the biological control of pepper wilt by means of actinomycetes native to the State of Aguascalientes" (AGS-2011-C02-181930), and Dr. Sylvia Patricia Fernández Pavía of the IIAF-UMSNH Plant Pathology Laboratory for kindly providing the Phytophthora capsici CH11 strain. The first author is grateful to CONACYT for the grant awarded for his doctoral studies (CVU 424465), and to the Joint CONACYT-Government of the State of Aguascalientes Fund for the support to participate in the project.

    References

    Abdalla, M. A., Win, H. Y., Islam, M. T., von Tiedemann, A., Schüffler, A., & Laatsch, H. (2011). Khatmiamycin, a motility inhibitor and zoosporicide against the grapevine downy mildew pathogen Plasmopara viticola from Streptomyces sp. ANK313. The Journal of Antibiotics, 64(10), 655-659. doi: 10.1038/ja.2011.68

    Arfaoui, A., Adam, L. R., Bezzahou, A., & Daayf, F. (2018). Isolation and identification of cultivated bacteria associated with soybeans and their biocontrol activity against Phytophthora sojae. BioControl, 63(4), 607-617. doi: 10.1007/s10526-018-9873-9

    Bérdy, J. (2012). Thoughts and facts about antibiotics: Where we are now and where we are heading. The Journal of Antibiotics , 65, 385-395. doi: 10.1038/ja.2012.27

    Chen, Y. Y., Chen, P. C., & Tsay, T. T. (2016). The biocontrol efficacy and antibiotic activity of Streptomyces plicatus on the oomycete Phytophthora capsici. Biological Control, 98, 34-42. doi: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2016.02.011

    Drenth, A., & Guest, D. I. (2004). Biology of Phytophthora. In: Drenth, A., & Guest, D. I. (Eds.), Diversity and management of Phytophthora in Southeast Asia (pp. 29-58). Canberra, Australia: ACIAR Monograph.

    Edwards, U., Rogall, T., Blockerl, H., Emde, M., & Bottger, E. C. (1989). Isolation and direct complete nucleotide determination of entire genes. Characterization of a gene coding for 16S ribosomal RNA. Nucleic Acids Research, 17(19), 7843-7853. doi: 10.1093/nar/17.19.7843

    Evangelista-Martínez, Z. (2014). Isolation and characterization of soil Streptomyces species as potential biological control agents against fungal plant pathogens. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 30(5), 1639-1647. doi: 10.1007/s11274-013-1568-x

    Fonseca-Ardila, Y. A., Castellanos-Suárez, D. E., & León-Sicard, T. E. (2011). Efecto antagónico in vitro de actinomicetos aislados de purines de chipaca (Bidens pilosa L.) frente a Phytophthora infestans (Mont) de Bary. Revista Facultad Nacional de Agronomía Medellín, 64(2), 6111-6119. Retrieved from http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=179922664008

    Hu, J., Hong, C., Stromberg, E. L., & Moorman, G. W. (2007). Effects of propamocarb hydrochloride on mycelial growth, sporulation, and infection by Phytophthora nicotianae isolates from Virginia nurseries. Plant Disease, 91(4), 414-420. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-91-4-0414

    Islam, M. T., Laatsch, H., & von Tiedemann, A. (2016). Inhibitory effects of macrotetrolides from Streptomyces spp. on zoosporogenesis and motility of peronosporomycete zoospores are likely linked with enhanced ATPase activity in mitochondria. Frontiers in Microbiology, 7, 1824. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01824

    Joo, G. J. (2005). Production of an anti-fungal substance for biological control of Phytophthora capsici causing phytophthora blight in red-peppers by Streptomyces halstedii. Biotechnology Letters, 27(3), 201-205. doi: 10.1007/s10529-004-7879-0

    Judelson, H. S., & Blanco, F. A. (2005). The spores of Phytophthora: weapons of the plant destroyer. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 3, 47-58. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1064

    Jung, T., Pérez-Sierra, A., Durán, A., Jung, M. H., Balci, Y., & Scanu, B. (2018). Canker and decline diseases caused by soil- and airborne Phytophthora species in forests and woodlands. Persoonia, 40, 182-220. doi: 10.3767/persoonia.2018.40.08

    Kimura, M. (1980). A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. Journal of Molecular Evolution, 16, 111-120. doi: 10.1007/BF01731581

    Kumar, S., Stecher, G., Li, M., Knyaz, C., & Tamura, K. (2018). MEGA X: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 35(6), 1547-1549. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msy096

    Kurth, F., Mailänder, S., Bönn, M., Feldhahn, L., Herrmann, S., Große, I., Buscot, F., Schrey, S. D., & Tarkka, M. T. (2014). Streptomyces-induced resistance against oak powdery mildew involves host plant responses in defense, photosynthesis, and secondary metabolism pathways. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions, 27(9), 891-900. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-10-13-0296-R

    Lamichhane, J. R., Dürr, C., Schwanck, A. A., Robin, M. H., Sarthou, J. P., Cellier, V., Aubertot, J. N. (2017). Integrated management of damping-off diseases. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 37, 10. doi: 10.1007/s13593-017-0417-y

    Lamour, K. H., Stam, R., Jupe, J., & Huitema, E. (2012). The oomycete broad-host-range pathogen Phytophthora capsici. Molecular Plant Pathology, 13(4), 329-337. doi: 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2011.00754.x

    Lee, J. Y., Moon, S. S., Yun, B. S., Yoo, I. D., & Hwang, B. K. (2004). Thiobutacin, a novel antifungal and antioomycete antibiotic from Lechevalieria aerocolonigenes. Journal of Natural Products, 67(12), 2076-2078. doi: 10.1021/np049786v

    Lee, J. Y., Sherman, D. H., & Hwang, B. K. (2008). In vitro antimicrobial and in vivo antioomycete activities of the novel antibiotic thiobutacin. Pest Management Science, 64(2), 172-177. doi: 10.1002/ps.1494

    McGinnis, S., & Madden, T. L. (2004). BLAST: at the core of a powerful and diverse set of sequence analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Research, 32, 20-25. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh435

    Nguyen, X. H., Naing, K. W., Lee, Y. S., Kim, Y. H., Moon, J. H., & Kim, K. Y. (2015). Antagonism of antifungal metabolites from Streptomyces griseus H7602 against Phytophthora capsici. Journal of Basic Microbiology, 55(1), 45-53. doi: 10.1002/jobm.201300820

    Nguyen, X. H., Naing, K. W., Lee, Y. S., Tindwa, H., Lee, G. H., Jeong, B. K., … Kim, K. Y. (2012). Biocontrol potential of Streptomyces griseus H7602 against root rot disease (Phytophthora capsici) in pepper. The Plant Pathology Journal, 28(3), 282-289. doi: 10.5423/PPJ.OA.03.2012.0040

    O’Brien, P. A. (2017). Biological control of plant diseases. Australasian Plant Pathology, 46(4), 293-304. doi: 10.1007/s13313-017-0481-4

    Reyes-Tena, A., Fernández-Pavia, S., Rincón-Enríquez, G., López-Pérez, L., & Quiñones-Aguilar, E. (2014). Selección de actinomicetos antagonistas a diferentes cepas de Phytophthora capsici. Revista Mexicana de Fitopatología, 32, S53. Retrieved from http://rmf.smf.org.mx/suplemento/docs/Volumen322014/Integrado/SUPLEMENTOINTEGRADO_32_2014.pdf

    Reyes-Tena, A., Rincón-Enríquez, G., López-Pérez, L., & Quiñones-Aguilar, E. E. (2017). Effect of mycorrhizae and actinomycetes on growth and bioprotection of Capsicum annuum L. against Phytophthora capsici. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 54(3), 513-522. doi: 10.21162/PAKJAS/17.4245

    Rincón-Enríquez, G., López-Pérez, L., & Quiñones-Aguilar, E. E. (2014). Efectividad biológica in vitro de actinomicetos sobre el agente causal del tizón de halo en frijol. Revista Fitotecnia Mexicana, 37(3), 229-234. Retrieved from http://www.scielo.org.mx/pdf/rfm/v37n3/v37n3a8.pdf

    Ristaino, J. B. (1990). Intraspecific variation among isolates of Phytophthora capsici from pepper and cucurbit fields in North Carolina. Phytopathology, 80(11), 1253-1259. doi: 10.1094/Phyto-80-1253

    Sadeghi, A., Koobaz, P., Azimi, H., Karimi, E., & Akbari, A. R. (2017). Plant growth promotion and suppression of Phytophthora drechsleri damping-off in cucumber by cellulase-producing Streptomyces. BioControl , 62(6), 805-819. doi: 10.1007/s10526-017-9838-4

    Saitou, N., & Nei, M. (1987). The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Molecular Biology and Evolution , 4(4), 406-425. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040454

    Sellem, I., Triki, M. A., Elleuch, L., Cheffi, M., Chakchouk, A., Smaoui, S., & Mellouli, L. (2017). The use of newly isolated Streptomyces strain TN258 as potential biocontrol agent of potato tubers leak caused by Pythium ultimum. Journal of Basic Microbiology , 57(5), 393-401. doi: 10.1002/jobm.201600604

    Servicio de Información Agroalimentaria y Pesquera (SIAP). (2019). Panorama agroalimentario 2019. Mexico: Author. Retrieved from https://nube.siap.gob.mx/gobmx_publicaciones_siap/pag/2019/Atlas-Agroalimentario-2019

    Sharma, V., & Salwan, R. (2018). Biocontrol potential and applications of actinobacteria in agriculture. In: Singh, B. P., Gupta, V. K., & Passari, A. K. (Eds.), New and Future Developments in Microbial Biotechnology and Bioengineering (pp. 93-108). India: Elsevier. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-63994-3.00006-0

    Stackebrandt, E., & Liesack, W. (1993). Nucleic acids and classification. In: Goodfellow, M., & O'Donnell, A. G. (Eds.), Handbook of New Bacterial Systematics (pp. 152-189). USA: Academic Press. Retrieved from https://books.google.com.mx/books?redir_esc=y&hl=es&id=pmYXAQAAIAAJ&focus=searchwithinvolume&q=1492

    Stanghellini, M. E., Kim, D. H., Rasmussen, S. L., & Rorabaugh, P. A. (1996). Control of root rot of peppers caused by Phytophthora capsici with a nonionic surfactant. Plant Disease, 80(10), 1113-1116. doi: 10.1094/PD-80-1113

    StatPoint Inc. (2005). User Manual: StatGraphics Centurion , ver. XV. Virginia, USA: Author. Retrieved from http://www.statgraphics.com

    Thampi, A., & Bhai, R. S. (2017). Rhizosphere actinobacteria for combating Phytophthora capsici and Sclerotium rolfsii, the major soil borne pathogens of black pepper (Piper nigrum L.). Biological Control, 109, 1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2017.03.006

    Thompson, J. D., Higgins, D. G., & Gibson, T. J. (1994). CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Research , 22(22), 4673-4680. doi: 10.1093/nar/22.22.4673

    Toquin, V., Latorse, M. P., & Beffa, R. (2019). Fluopicolide: a new anti-oomycete fungicide. In: Jeschke, P., Witschel, M., Krämer, W., & Schirmer, U. (Eds.), Modern Crop Protection Compounds (pp. 871-878). USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. doi: 10.1002/9783527699261.ch21

    Weisburg, W. G., Barns, S. M., Pelletier, D. A., & Lane, D. J. (1991). 16S ribosomal DNA amplification for phylogenetic study. Journal of Bacteriology, 173(2), 697-703. doi: 10.1128/jb.173.2.697-703.1991

    Wu, J., Xue, Z., Miao, J., Zhang, F., Gao, X., & Liu, X. (2020). Sensitivity of different developmental stages and resistance risk assessment of Phytophthora capsici to fluopicolide in China. Frontiers in Microbiology , 11, 185. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00185

    Yan, Y., Zhang, S., & Li, K. (2019). Antagonistic activity and mechanism of an isolated Streptomyces corchorusii stain AUH-1 against phytopathogenic fungi. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology , 35, 145. doi: 10.1007/s11274-019-2720-z

    Figures:

    Figure 1. Behavior of the in vitro growth inhibition ability of Phytophthora capsici CH11 by different strains of Streptomyces spp. (mean ± standard deviation). zMeans with the same letter within pre-incubation time (lowercase) or by strains (uppercase) do not differ statistically (Tukey, P ≤ 0.05).
    Figure 2. In vitro antagonistic activity of different strains of Streptomyces spp. against Phytophthora capsici CH11.
    Figure 3. Biorational control of wilt in serrano pepper var. Camino Real plants by actinobacteria 10 days after inoculation with Phytophthora capsici CH11. Bar = 5 cm.
    Figure 4. Neighbor-Joining phylogenetic tree based on partial 16S rRNA gene sequences showing the phylogenetic relationships between strains ABV38, ABV39 and ABV45 with other species of the genus Streptomyces. The numbers beside the branches are Bootstrap values (%). The sequence of Streptosporangium fragile DSM 43847 was used as an outgroup. The accession number of each sequence is shown in parentheses. Bar = 0.01 substitutions per nucleotide position.

    Tables:

    Table 1. Effect of the application of the broth culture supernatant of actinobacterias on the survival percentage of serrano pepper var. Camino Real plants 10 days after inoculation with Phytophthora capsici CH11.
    Treatment Survival (%)
    T1) Streptomyces sp. ABV38 100 az
    T2) Streptomyces sp. ABV38 + P. capsici CH11 77 b
    T3) Streptomyces sp. ABV39 100 a
    T4) Streptomyces sp. ABV39 + P. capsici CH11 0 c
    T5) Streptomyces sp. ABV45 100 a
    T6) Streptomyces sp. ABV45 + P. capsici CH11 94 a
    T7) Control (healhty plants) 100 a
    T8) Control + P. capsici CH11 (diseased plants) 0 c
    T9) Chemical control 100 a
    T10) Chemical control + P. capsici CH11 100 a
    z Means with the same letter do not differ statistically (Tukey, P ≤ 0.05).