Revista de Geografía Agrícola
The impact of territory and knowledge on the globalization of hand-made cheeses: an analysis from the LAS1 approach
ISSNe: 2448-7368   |   ISSN: 0186-4394
PDF

Keywords

Knowledge
transfer
Localized Agri-food Systems
territory

How to Cite

López Santos, J. ., & Santos Corral, M. J. (2021). The impact of territory and knowledge on the globalization of hand-made cheeses: an analysis from the LAS1 approach. Revista De Geografía Agrícola, (66), 75–91. https://doi.org/10.5154/r.rga.2019.66.04

Abstract

Innovation in Localized Agri-Food Systems (LAFS) is based on processes of transfer of diverse knowledge. According to Asheim (2007:224), there are three bases of knowledge (synthetic, analytical and symbolic) that differ in the rationality of their creation, in their tacit and / or codified content and in the modes of transmission. The objectives of the research were: a) to specify the characteristics of the knowledge bases in the LAS according to the Asheim ́s scheme and the link between consumption and culture; b) analyze the processes of transfer of knowledge according to the scheme outlined and the link with the market in the LAS; c) characterize the role of innovation in the changes to food production processes that should retain traditional flavors. In the methodology, the case study was used under the modality of two cases in different contexts (LAS-Aculco and LAS-Cabrales) and an ethnographic work for the collection of information. It was found that the symbolic base is concretized in subjective interpretations associated with the production and consumption of cheeses; these knowledges are transferred in the dynamics of daily life and in the producer-consumer relationship. The synthetic, emphasizes a highly tacit and endogenous know-how, is shared “face to face” between producers, by observation, visits to dairies, and by employee mobility. The analytic is presented through scientific-technological actors and is transmitted unidirectionally through courses and technical assistance.

https://doi.org/10.5154/r.rga.2019.66.04
PDF

References

Asheim. (2007). “Differentiated Knowledge Bases and Varieties of Regional Innovation Systems”, Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research 20 (3): 223–41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610701722846.

Asturias. (1985). Decreto 22, de 7 de marzo, por el que se aprueba el reglamento de la Denominación de Origen Cabrales y su Consejo Regulador. Boletín Oficial. Del principado de asturias y de la provincia.

Aurier, Fort, & Sirieix. (2005). “Exploring terroir product meanings for the consumer” Antrhopology of food (4). URL: http://aof.revues.org/187

Boucher. (2012). “Reflexiones en torno al enfoque LAS: evolución y avances desde la Agroindustria Rural (AIR) hasta los Sistemas Agroalimentarios Localizados (LAS)”, en: Torres, G. y Larroa, R. M. (Coord.). Sistemas Agroalimentarios Localizados, Identidad Territorial, Construcción de Capital Social e Instituciones. México, UNAM, pp. 43-68.

Camacho, Cervantes, Cesín, & Palacios. (2019). “Los alimentos artesanales y la modernidad alimentaria” Estudios Sociales, Vol. 29, Núm. 53

Caravaca, I., González, G., & Silva, R. (2005). “Innovación, redes, recursos patrimoniales y desarrollo territorial” EURE. Vol. 31, Núm. 94, pp.5-24.

Castañeda, Boucher, & Sánchez. (2009). “La concentración de agroindustrias rurales de producción de quesos en el noroeste del Estado de México: un estudio de caracterización” Estudios Sociales, Vol. 17, Núm. 34, 2009, pp. 74-109.

Chabrol, & Muchnik. (2011). “Consumer Skills Contribute to Maintaining and Diffusing Heritage Food Products” Anthropology of Food (8) URL: http://aof.revues.org/6847

Crespo, Requier-Desjardins, & Vicente. (2014). Crespo, Joan, et al. (2014). “Why can collective action fail in Local Agri-food Systems? A social network analysis of cheese producers in Aculco, Mexico” Food Policy 46 (2014) 165–177

González, & Cuervo-Arango. (2011). El libro del cabrales: el sabor del saber. Colombia: Consejo Regulador y Fundación Cabrales.

Martin. (2013) “Differentiated Knowledge Bases and the Nature of Innovation Networks” European Planning Studies 21 (9): 1418–36. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.755836.

Maskell, Bathelt, & Malmberg. (2004). “Temporary Clusters and Knowledge Creation: The Effects of International Trade Fairs, Conventions and Other Professional Gatherings” Spaces 2004-04: 1–34.

Mattes. (2012). “Dimensions of Proximity and Knowledge Bases: Innovation between Spatial and Non-Spatial Factors” Regional Studies 46 (8): 1085–99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2011.552493.

Méndez. (2002). “Innovación y desarrollo territorial: algunos debates teóricos recientes” EURE. Vol. 28, Núm. 84.

Testa. (2014). “Knowledge Intensity and Knowledge Bases in Internationalization Patterns of SMEs in the Food Sector” Journal of International Food & Agribusiness Marketing, 26:2, 67-88.

Yin. (2003). Case study research: Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2021 Revista de Geografía Agrícola