Revista de Geografía Agrícola
Perception of climate change of semi-urban and rural farmers of León, Guanajuato
ISSNe: 2448-7368   |   ISSN: 0186-4394
PDF

Keywords

Environmental Perception
climate change
adaptation
peri-urban farmers
León Guanajuato.

How to Cite

Vélez-Torres, Álvaro, Santos-Ocampo, Ángel, De la Tejera-Hernández, B. G., & Monterroso-Rivas, A. I. (2016). Perception of climate change of semi-urban and rural farmers of León, Guanajuato. Revista De Geografía Agrícola, (57), 179–190. https://doi.org/10.5154/r.rga.2016.57.008

Abstract

The perception of the people on climate change is important, as well as to identify if adaptation practices at the local level have been carried out. Studying environmental perception assumes the relationship between an organism and environmental variables. An analysis of variance and statistical correlation can be used to find general relationships. The triangulation method of meteorological data and surveys were used for this study. In León, Guanajuato, the majority perception of peri-urban and rural farmers is that there has been an increase in temperature, which coincides with that reported by local meteorological systems, indicating that the maximum temperature in the last thirty years (1961-2009) increased 0,092 °C per year. Given this change in temperature, farmers have used adaptation strategies as shifting cultivation, use of native seeds and incorporation of organic matter to the soil, which agrees with that reported in recent literature. However, agriculture is in a difficult moment because of its loss of profitability; in the case of the peri-urban, the real growth of the city makes obstructs the agricultural production specially when competing for space. However, the extra income from a plot subsidizes the agricultural production, in most cases without an effective return.

https://doi.org/10.5154/r.rga.2016.57.008
PDF

References

Bartra A. 2013. Crisis civilizatoria. En: Ornelas R. (coodr.) Crisis civilizatoria y superación del capitalismo. Primera edición. UNAM, Instituto de Investigaciones Económicas, 2013. pp. 45.

Brohan, P., J.J. Kennedy, I. Harris, S.F.B. Tett, and P.D. Jones. 2006. Uncertainty estimates in regional and global observed temperature changes: a new dataset from 1850. Journal of Geophysical Research, D12106(111):1-21.

Brunswik E. Organismic Achievement and Environmental. Probability. University of California, 50(3):255-272. Consultado 2015. Disponible en http://psycnet.apa.org/psycinfo/1943-02543-001

Cooney C. 2010. Shperes of influence / The Perception Factor. The perception factor climate change gets personal, Environmental Health Perspectives, 118(11):485-489.

Córdova K. 2003. Impactos socioambientales de la variabilidad climática. Las sequías en Venezuela. Terra Nueva Etapa, 19(28): 35-51.

El-Borie, E. Shafik, A. Abdel-halim and S. El-Monier. 2010. “Spectral Analysis of Solar Variability and their Possible Role on the Global Warming, Journal of Environmental Protection, 1(2):111-116.

https://doi.org/10.4236/jep.2010.12014

Fernández, N. 2006. ¿Cómo analizar datos cualitativos? Instituto de Ciencias de la Educación. Universidad de Barcelona, Butlletí La Recerca, 2006(6):1-13.

GEG. 2008. (Gobierno del Estado de Guanajuato), Instituto de Ecología del Estado de Guanajuato y Semarnat. Programa para Mejorar la Calidad del Aire en León 2008-2012. México. 150 p.

Horra J. 2003. Estadística aplicada. Ed. Díaz de Santos.

Holahan, C. 2006. Psicología ambiental un enfoque general. Ed. Limusa. 459 p.

INE. 2010. Instituto Nacional de Ecología. El cambio climático en México, informe por estados. http://www2ine.gob.mx/cclimatico/edo_sector/estados/futuro_guanajuato.html

IPCC. 2007. Panel Intergubernamental de Cambio Climático. Modelos de cambio climático. Anexo B. http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/technical-papers/climate-changesbiodiversity-sp.pdf

IPCC. 2013. Panel intergubernamental de Cambio Climático. Ciencia física básica. Twelfth Session of Working Group I. Approved Summary for Policymakers. http://www.climatechange2013.org/images/report/WG1AR5_SPM_FINAL.pdf

IPLANEG. 2012. Instituto de Planeación del Estado de Guanajuato. http://www.gob.guanajuato.mx

Jacobson H., Martin P. 1990. A framework for research on the human dimensions of global environmental change. Barcelona: Human Dimensions of Global Change Pro gram. http://www.ciesin.columbia.edu/docs/005-351/005-351.html

Landscheidt T. 2008. Solar Wind Near Earth: Indicator of Variations in Global Temperature. Scientific. Schroeter Institute for Research in Cycles of Solar Activity. http://www.mitosyfraudes.org/Calen/SolarWind.html

Lohr S. 2000. Muestreo: Diseño y análisis. Ed. International Thompson Editores, México. 480 p.

Montaño C., M. 2012. Estudio de percepción de la problemática ambiental en Arauca: Herramientas para la valoración ecosistémica, gestión y ambiente, 1(15):119-128. Open Access

Morales V. 2008. Medidas de descriptivas básicas de tendencia central y dispersión. Estadística aplicada a las ciencias sociales. Madrid, España: Universidad Pontífica Comillas. 350 p.

SAGARPA. 2013. Delegación Estatal en Guanajuato. 2013. Distrito de Desarrollo Rural León. Programa Procampo productivo.

Valdez-Cepeda, R. D., D. Hernández-Ramírez, B. Mendoza-Ortega, J. Valdés-Galicia and D. Maravilla. 2003. Fractality of monthly extreme minimum temperature, Fractals, 11(2): 137-144.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2016 Revista de Geografía Agrícola