Keywords
forest conservation
forest income
forest communities
choice experiments
REDD
How to Cite
Abstract
Participation of forest communities in forest conservation management could increase the potential to achieve the goal of reducing emissions from forest degradation and mitigate climate change effects. Forest conservation requires a change (or cease) in economic activities that are traditionally practiced by forest communities which contribute to forest degradation. In this study we estimate the minimum amount of compensation required to forgo the main activities contributing to forest degradation. In order to do so, data collected from interviews made to farmers in Western Mexico were used. Results from the conditional logit model show the relative importance the interviewed farmers give to the traditional agricultural system, cattle grazing and lumber extraction (firewood and construction posts). Without proper compensation, restriction of these activities would affect the livelihood of forest communities and hold back farmers willingness to participate, conditioning the success of forest conservation. These results identify some challenges for international climate change mitigation policies, such as reduction of emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+).
References
Agarwal, A., & Gupta, K. (2005). Decentralization and participation: the governance of common pool resources in Nepal’s Teral. World Development. 33, 1101-1114.
Agarwal, B. (2001). Participatory exclusions, community forestry, and gender: an analysis for South Asia and a conceptual framework. Erratum. World Development. 29, 1623-1648.
Amelung, T., & Diehl, M. (1992). Deforestation o tropical rain forests: economic causes and impact on development. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr.
Angelsen, A., & Wunder, S. (2003). Exploring the forest poverty link: key concept issues, and research implications. Ocassional paper No. 40. CIFOR. Bagor,
Indonesia.
Angelsen, A., Jagger, P., Babigumira, R., Belcher, B., Hogarth, N.,…, Wunder, S. (2014). Environmental income and rural livelihoods: a global-comparative analysis. World Development. 64(S1), S12–S28.
Borrego, A., & Skutsch, M. (2014). Estimating the opportunity costs of activities that cause degradation in tropical dry forests: Impications for REDD+. Ecological Economics. 101, 1-9.
Borrego, A., & Skutsch, M. (2019). How socio-economic differences between farmers affect forest degradation in western Mexico. Forests. 10(10), 1-17.
Brännlund, R., Sidibe, A., & Gong, P. (2009). Participation to forest conservation in National Kabore Tambi Park in Southern Burkina Faso. Forests Policy and Economics. 11(7), 468-474.
Bush, G., Hanley, N., Moro, M., & Rondeau, R. (2013). Measuring the local costs of conservation: a provision point mechanism for eliciting willingness to accept
compensation. Land Economics. 89(3), 490–513.
Campbell, B. M., & Luckert, M. (2002). Uncovering the hidden harvest: valuation methods for woodland and forest resources. (B. Campbell & M. Luckert, Eds.). London, UK. New York, USA.: Earthscan Publications Ltd.
Coomes, O., Grimard, F., Potvin, C., & Sima, P. (2008). The fate of the tropical forest: Carbon or cattle? Ecological Economics, 65(2), 207-212.
De Salvo, M., Cucuzza, G., Cosentino, S., Nicita, L., & Signorello, G. (2018). Farmers’ preferences for enhancing sustainability in arable lands: Evidence from a choice experiment in Sicily (Italy). New Medit. 17(4), 57–70.
Foley, J., Asner, G., Costa, M., Coe, M., DeFries, R.,…, Snyder, P. (2007). Amazonia revealed: Forest degradation and loss of ecosystem goods and services in the Amazon Basin. The Ecological Society of America. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. 5(1), 25–32.
Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). (2010). Evaluacion de los recursos forestales mundiales 2010. Informe principal. (GreenInk, Ed.). Roma, Italia: Departamento Forestal de la FAO.
Hensher, D., Rose, J., & Greene, W. (2005). Applied choice analysis. (D. Hensher, J. Rose, & W. Greene, Eds.). United Kindom.
Hosonuma, N., Herold, M., De Sy, V., De Fries, R., Brockhaus, M.,…, Romijn, E. (2012). An assessment of deforestation and forest degradation drivers in developing countries. Environmental Research Letters. 7(4), 1-12.
Ickowitz, A., Sills, E., & De Sassi, C. (2017). Estimating Smallholder Opportunity Costs of REDD+: A pantropical analysis from households to carbon and back. World Development. 95, 15–26.
Insituto de Información Estadística y Geográfica de Jalisco (IIEG). (2010). Índice municipal de medio ambiente.
Johannesen, A. B. (2005). Wildlife conservation policies and incentives to hunt: an empirical analysis of illegal hunting in western Serengeti, Tanzania. Environment and Development Economics. 10(3), 271–292.
Kar, S., & Jacobson, M. (2012). NTFP income contribution to household economy and related socio-economic factors: Lessons from Bangladesh. Forest Policy and Economics. 14, 136-142.
Kissinger, G., Herold, M., & Sy V. De. (2012). Drivers of deforestation and forest degradation: A synthesis repor for REDD+ Policymakers. Vancouver, Canada.
Krinsky, I., & Robb, L. (1986). On approximating the statistical properties of elasticities. The Review of Economics and Statistics. 68(4), 715–719.
Maraseni, T., Neupane, P., Lopez-Casero, F., & Cadman, T. (2014). An assessment of the impacts of the REDD+ pilot project on community forests user groups
(CFUGs) and their commnity forests in Nepal. Journal of Environmental Management, (136), 37-46.
McFadden, D. (1974). Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice bahavior. In Frontiers in econometrics. 105–142. New York, US: Academic Press.
McShane, T., & Wells, M. (2004). Getting biodiversity projects to work: towards nore effective conservation and development. (T. McShane & M. Wells, Eds.). New York, US: Columbia University Press.
Morales-Barquero, L., Borrego, A., Skutsch, M., Kleinn, C., & Healey, J. R. (2015). Identification and quantification of drivers of forest degradation in tropical dry forests: a case study in Western Mexico. Land Use Policy. 49, 296–309.
Myers, N. (1992). Tropical forests: The policy challenge. The Environmentalist. 12(1), 15-27.
Ostrom, E. (2009). Governing the commons: The evolution of Institutions for Collective Actions (Canto Classics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sills, E., Lele, S., Holmes, T., & Pattanayak, S. (2003). Nontimber forest products in the rural household economy. En: Sills, Erin O.; Abt, Karen Lee, (eds). Forests
in a market economy. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Pp. 259-281.
Skutsch, M., Paneque-Gálvez, J., Ghilardi, A., Balderas Torres, A., Morfin-Rios,…, Ross, D. (2017). Adapting REDD+ policy to sink conditions. Forest Policy and Economics. 80, 160–166.
Train, K. (2003). Discrete choice methods with simulation. (K. Train, Ed.). New York, US: Cambdrige University Press.
Vedeld, P., Angelsen, A., Bojö, J., Sjaastad, E., & Kobugabe, G. (2007). Forest environmental incomes and the rural poor. Forest Policy and Economics. 9(7), 869–879.
Zenteno, M., Zuidema, P., de Jong, W., & Boot, R.G.A. (2013). Livelihood strategiesand Forest dependes: New insights from Bolivian forest communities. Forest Policy and Economics. 26, 12–21.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2020 Revista de Geografía Agrícola