logo uach
logo Cori   
logo uach
COORDINACIÓN DE REVISTAS INSTITUCIONALES | UACh

e-ISSN: 2007-4018 / ISSN print: 2007-3828

Revista Chapingo Serie Ciencias Forestales y del Ambiente

Creative Commons License

Principal / Editorial / Editorial policy

Editorial policy

Aims and scope

The objective of the Revista Chapingo Serie Ciencias Forestales y del Ambiente (RCHSCFA) is to generate an international space for the dissemination and discussion of research results related to the forest field through the publication of unpublished scientific and technological articles.

Proposals submitted for evaluation must not have been previously published, nor be in a similar process in another journal. Neither will preliminary, incomplete or inconsequential research papers be accepted.

The RCHSCFA has been published by the Universidad Autónoma Chapingo since 1995, under an open access dissemination policy (available online). It is currently published on a bilingual (English and Spanish) and continuous (one annual volume) basis, with e-ISSN: 2007-4018. Contributions are received only through the Editorial Manager®. They are examined by a scientific committee and evaluated anonymously (double-blind modality) by peer experts. The average receipt-acceptance time for contributions in the last year was 7 months.
Accepted articles will be published as “In process” once the editing and style correction process has been approved. This document will then be replaced by the final version.

Topics

The RCHSCFA considers those manuscripts that contribute to research on forest environments (arid, temperate, and tropical) and that are related to any of the following topics:

  • Silviculture and management: forest nurseries, fire ecology, forest ecology, endangered plant and animal species, forest management, commercial plantations, forest health, non-timber forest products, and technology of timber forest products.
  • Forestry economics and sociology: natural resource economics, markets and marketing of forest products, environmental economics, project formulation and evaluation, and forestry sociology.
  • Statistics, informatics, and mathematics: quantitative models for forest management, stand production and yield, and social measurements.
  • Environment: environmental impact, carbon sequestration, and pollution from industrial processes.

Section policies

All contributions considered for peer review must be unpublished (written in Spanish or English) and the product of original research. They must also be in line with the topics considered by the RCHSCFA. The types of contributions received are:

  • Scientific articles
  • Scientific or technological notes
  • Review articles
  • Methodologies

For more details on the characteristics of each type of manuscript, please see the Guide for authors.

Submission

The process of submission and review of manuscripts is done through the Editorial Manager®. The person responsible for the submission is the “corresponding author”, and is the only one with whom communication will be maintained throughout the process. The documents and information required for the submission are:

  • Cover letter
  • Front page
  • Manuscript
  • Figures
  • ORCID identifier of each author
  • Full name, email and place of assignment of at least three potential reviewers with extensive experience in the subject of the manuscript.

For more information regarding documents, see the Guide for authors.

If the paper is in line with the journal's topics and research areas, and meets the requirements described in the Guide for authors, an email will be sent to acknowledge receipt of the manuscript, in which a reference key will be assigned, which must be specified in any procedure or query. Failure to comply with the criteria described in the Guide for authors will lead to rejection (topic outside the scope of the journal or duplication of content) or return of the manuscript for correction before starting the evaluation process.
Each paper submitted to the RCHSCFA will be checked for possible plagiarism using iThenticate®. If the tool detects a similarity greater than 10 % with respect to other published works —in the introduction, results and discussion, and conclusions sections—, the submitted paper will be definitively rejected.

Peer review

The scientific review of manuscripts is carried out under the double-blind modality through the Editorial Manager®. This system allows detailed monitoring of this process and offers special formats for the assignment of Assistant Editors and reviewers, as well as the required formats for the issuance of decisions and communication with the corresponding author.

Once the manuscript has been approved in the initial review and the reference key has been assigned, the Editor-in-Chief, together with the Assistant Editor, will invite at least two reviewers to evaluate the manuscript. The reviewers must be peer experts on the manuscript's subject and not be affiliated with the authors' institution. If a reviewer declines the invitation, does not complete his or her assignment within the indicated period (30 days), or the opinion is not well-founded, the Assistant Editor will invite another reviewer or ask the same reviewer to explain his or her decision until at least two reviews have been completed.

At the end of the review of the manuscript, the reviewers' decision can be:

  • Accepted. This implies that the manuscript will be published as submitted
  • Minor revision. This type of decision is founded on grammatical, technical, and formatting deficiencies.
  • Major revision. This criterion includes suggestions for changes in the methodological design, the presentation of results, clarification of techniques or experiments, or inclusion of data that give scientific validity to the results and conclusions of the manuscript.
  • Rejected. This opinion indicates that the contribution cannot be considered for publication in the way it was presented.

The Assistant Editor will review the comments of the reviewers and issue a single opinion that will be sent to the corresponding author by email, as a result of the following actions:

  1. Reviewing the manuscript submitted, applying the same evaluation criteria as the reviewers.
  2. Reviewing and resolving any possible contradictory aspects between the reviewers' opinions.
  3. Issuing an opinion on both the reviewers' evaluation and the submitted manuscript, which will be reviewed by the Editor-in-Chief, who will verify that an adequate evaluation has been carried out in accordance with the Editorial Policy.

At the end of the review of the contribution, the reviewers' and Assistant Editor’s decision can be accepted, minor revision, major revision and rejected.

If the contribution is accepted, an email will be sent to the authors with the decision and the bank account details for depositing the recovery fee for the publication process.

If the manuscript is designated for a minor or major review, the authors must address the observations made by the reviewers. If the authors do not agree with any suggested change, they must fully justify the lack of attention to said comment. Once the author has made the proposed changes, he or she must upload the new version of the manuscript into the system along with a response sheet, which must include a detailed response to each observation and the part of the article (section or line) where the change was made. Authors must make sure not to include their names on the response sheet to continue with the double-blind review.

If there is no response from the author within the period established for addressing the observations (15 days for minor revision and 30 days for major revision), the article will be rejected; if the authors wish, they could start the submission process again. If the authors require more time to make corrections, the corresponding author must send an email through the Editorial Manager® system specifying the requested time.

Upon receipt of the corrected manuscript, the Editor-in-Chief will forward it to an Assistant Editor to verify that the changes have been made. The authors must justify —in theoretical, methodological and empirical terms— the reasons for not making some of the suggested modifications. Some manuscripts with significant modifications may be sent back to the reviewers for approval or rejection of the second version based on their initial observations. If the evaluation is positive, the manuscript will be "accepted" for publication. If the evaluation is negative, the new opinion of the manuscript will be "rejected".

Once the contribution has been accepted, the authors must send, by email, the copyright transfer letter to initiate the publication process, which consists of editing and style correction, translation, design, and online publication of the manuscript. At each stage, the corresponding author will receive an email for approval.

The Editor-in-Chief has the authority to determine the date on which the manuscript will be published.

Complaints and appeals

The corresponding author may appeal decisions issued by the RCHSCFA regarding errors detected in the processor or changes suggested by the referees, the Associate Editors, or the Editor-in-Chief, as well as the rejection of the manuscript. To that end, the corresponding author may submit an appeal, which will be processed in accordance with the following procedure:

  1. The corresponding author shall have a maximum of 10 business days, starting from the day following the date of notification of the decision, to file the initial appeal. Once this period has elapsed, your right to initiate this proceeding will expire.
  2. The corresponding author will send the Editor-in-Chief, via email, a written appeal that must contain:
    1. Name of the corresponding author, email address, telephone number, as well as the title and key number of the manuscript subject to the contested resolution, proposed for publication in the RCHSCFA.
    2. A concise and detailed statement of the grounds for the appeal, along with the technical and evidentiary arguments supporting the claim.
    3. Handwritten signature or advanced electronic signature in the margin on each page of the document, and at the bottom of the last page.
  3. Within a maximum of 30 business days, the Editor-in-Chief will resolve the appeal by means of a duly reasoned and substantiated decision. This decision will be based on the manuscript, the reviews (from the Editor-in-Chief, the Associate Editor, and the reviewers), and, where applicable, the opinion of external experts in the field. The decision will consider the normative criteria used by the reviewers, scientific and technical advances, and current linguistic consensus, in accordance with the guidelines of the corresponding language.
  4. For the evaluation of the arguments and documents submitted, the principles of logic, sound judgment, and the established practices of the international scientific community will be considered.

Final appeal. If the corresponding author considers that the resolution issued by the Editor-in-Chief of the RCHSCFA in the initial appeal does not comply with the institution's regulations, he or she may submit a final appeal to the Editorial Committee within a maximum of 15 business days, starting from the day after receiving notification via email.

The final appeal procedure will be substantiated and definitively resolved within a period not exceeding 20 business days, exhausting the instance within the editorial scope of the institution.

Frequency of publication

The RCHSCFA is an annual journal of continuous publication in electronic version (e-ISSN: 2007-4018). Publishing is handled by the Coordinación de Revistas Institucionales (Coordination of Institutional Journals) of the Universidad Autónoma Chapingo.

Journal funding

The RCHSCFA is partially funded by the Universidad Autónoma Chapingo, through the Dirección General de Investigación, Posgrado y Servicio, which oversees the Coordinación de Revistas Institucionales. This office is directly responsible for providing the editorial tools and processes necessary for the publication of accepted submissions.

The RCHSCFA, being a non-profit organization, does not advertise commercial brands or scientific or institutional events.

Article publishing charge

Manuscripts accepted for publication will be subject to a 300.00 USD recovery fee, which will cover part of the costs of the publication process. The account information for depositing the fee from anywhere in Mexico is as follows:
Bank: Santander S. A.
Account number: 65501084813
Interbank CLABE: 014180655010848131
In the name of the Universidad Autónoma Chapingo

For international deposits, the account information is:
Bank: Santander S.A.
Account number: 82-50020139-5
Interbank CLABE: 014180825002013953
SWIFT code: BMSXMXMMXXX
In the name of the Universidad Autónoma Chapingo

Once your deposit has been made, you must send the corresponding receipt to the email account . If you require an invoice, you must attach the updated tax status certificate and indicate the use of the CFDI.

Publication fee exemption policy
In certain cases, upon request and justification, the Editor-in-Chief may decide to waive the publication fee for some papers, provided that all the authors of the contribution are affiliated with institutions in developing countries.

Use of artificial intelligence (AI)

The RCHSCFA allows the use of AI only to improve the readability and language of the contribution. If applicable, the contribution must include a description of the technologies used and what was generated with them.

Authors are responsible for supervising, reviewing, and editing information obtained using AI, as these technologies may generate incorrect information.

Under no circumstances may authors include AI as a co-author in the contribution, as this implies performing activities that can only be attributed to humans.

The RCHSCFA does not allow the use of generative AI or AI-assisted technologies (such as ChatGPT, Deepseek, or Claude) by reviewers and editors in the peer review process, to protect the rights of authors and the confidentiality of their research.

Privacy and confidentiality policy

The RCHSCFA’s privacy policy is based on the provisions of the General Law on the Protection of Personal Data Held by Obligated Entities (LGPDPPSO) and the General Guidelines on the Protection of Personal Data for the Public Sector, and is detailed in the document Simplified privacy notice: submission of scientific articles for publication in institutional journals, which can be consulted at: https://revistas.chapingo.mx/public/site/pdf/cori_DP-en.pdf

Digital preservation policy

The RCHSCFA ensures the long-term preservation, accessibility, and integrity of its digital content through institutional storage, backup, and interoperability mechanisms.

The content published in digital formats (PDF, HTML, and XML JATS) is hosted on external servers linked through an institutional domain of the Universidad Autónoma Chapingo, which ensures operational stability, continuous availability, and open access to scientific content.

The digital preservation strategy includes performing weekly backups of websites, editorial files, and associated databases, with the purpose of preventing data loss and ensuring content recovery in the event of technical contingencies.

Furthermore, the journal maintains active Digital Object identifiers (DOI) and interoperability mechanisms through OAI-PMH and XML-JATS (SciELO SPS), which facilitates the traceability, harvesting, and integration of articles into national and international indexing systems and academic platforms.

As the journal is indexed in SciELO Mexico, its content is preserved and made available in full text in accordance with international standards for scientific publishing.

Interoperability and metadata policy

The RCHSCFA offers interoperability services through the OAI-PMH protocol (Open Archives Initiative Protocol for Metadata Harvesting), accessible via the following URL: https://revistas.chapingo.mx/forestales/oai

The platform implements an advanced interoperability scheme that allows the exposure of structured metadata in Dublin Core and JATS XML format (SciELO SPS), facilitating integration with indexing systems, institutional repositories, and national and international scientific dissemination platforms.

In addition, it incorporates enriched metadata, interoperability with DOIs, links to PDFs, and compatibility with academic retrieval systems and external query services.

Self-archiving policy

The authors retain their property rights over the contribution, and therefore may deposit, self-archive, disseminate, or distribute the final published version in national or international repositories, as well as on personal websites, academic networks, and other open access media, in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license.

Therefore, the RCHSCFA does not establish embargo periods or restrictions for the deposit or dissemination of published articles. Self-archiving may be done immediately after publication of the manuscript in its final version or in advance publication format.

Every version of the deposited manuscript must include the full reference to the original publication (authorship, year of publication, title of the article, name of the journal, volume, article number, and DOI) to guarantee the correct attribution, citation, and traceability of the work.

Open access policy

The RCHSCFA, together with the Universidad Autónoma Chapingo, recognizes that to improve the process of dissemination of scientific knowledge, it must be accessible to any user without any legal or economic barrier. Therefore, authors who publish in the RCHSCFA accept the following terms and conditions:

  • Based on copyright legislation, the RCHSCFA recognizes and respects the moral rights of authors, as well as the ownership of the property rights of their work, which will be ceded to the Universidad Autónoma Chapingo through the signing of a copyright transfer agreement, in which they explicitly recognize that their work will be disseminated under the open access principles established by the journal.
  • Authors may make other independent and additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the final version of the published article (such as including it in an institutional or thematic repository, hosting it on academic social networks, or disseminating it on electronic or printed platforms). This is provided that the document is clearly and explicitly stated as having been first published in the RCHSCFA, that the reference is placed as proposed on the first page of the article, and that the respective digital object identifier (DOI) is included.

Licensing

All content published in the RCHSCFA is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license. This means that readers/users may freely access all content published in the journal, as well as cite, share (in print and electronic format), print, and distribute the documents, as long as it is clearly and explicitly mentioned that the document was first published in the RCHSCFA and the respective DOI is included. Likewise, the material cannot be used for commercial purposes.

Creative Commons License
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license

 

 

© Derechos reservados Universidad Autónoma Chapingo 2024 | Protección de Datos Personales