Current Topics in Agronomic Science
Use of native forages for regional nutritional blocks as goat feed supplement
ISSNe: 2954-4440
PDF
PDF - Spanish

Keywords

Feeding
goats
grazing
supplementation
tree foliage

How to Cite

García-Portuguez, J. E. (2022). Use of native forages for regional nutritional blocks as goat feed supplement. Current Topics in Agronomic Science, 2(2), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.5154/r.ctas.2021.12.11a.4

Plaudit

Abstract

A completely randomized experimental design with three treatments and three replicates was used to evaluate the technical-productive and economic viability of incorporating tree foliage from the epiphytic native plant called graft (graft plant) (Psittcanthus calyculatus) into regional nutritional blocks (RNB). Two RNB were prepared in a first phase. One of them, named RNB-1, was prepared with 5 % urea, 40 % molasses, 4 % common salt, 6 % lime, 4 % cement, 24 % ground sorghum residues, 2 % minerals, and 15 % ground tree foliage from the plant graft. The other, named RNB-2, was prepared with 5 % urea, 40 % molasses, 4 % common salt, 6 % lime, 4 % cement, 14% ground sorghum residues, 2 % minerals, and 25 % ground tree foliage from the plant graft. Three treatments were formed, one called T-0, with goats that did not receive any type of RNB, another, called T-1, with goats that received RNB-1, and the third, called T-2, with goats that received RNB-2. RNB-2 showed better physical (hardness) and chemical characteristics (24.70 % crude protein and 10.65 % crude fiber), with costs of 4.40 pesos·kg-1. In a second phase, the test of productive behavior was carried out, being both RNB preferred in the same way by goats (P > 0.05) and the supplementation with any of the RNB improved the increment of weight (P < 0.05). The artisanal elaboration of RNB was simple, economic, and promoted the efficient use of regional natural resources. This fact emphasizes the importance of rescuing and strengthening the roots of the rural population in local productive agricultural activities under schemes of sustainability and technological innovation and with own resources.

https://doi.org/10.5154/r.ctas.2021.12.11a.4
PDF
PDF - Spanish

References

Andrade Montemayor, H. M. (2017). Producción de caprino en México. Tierras. Caprino, 2017(18), 28-31.

AOAC. (2000). Methods of Analysis. 17va. Edición. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Washington, USA.

CONABIO. (2012). La biodiversidad en Guanajuato. Estudio de estado. México: Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad. México.

FAO. (2005). Livestock sector brief. México. Livestock information, Sector Analysis and Policy Branch (AGAL). Food and Agriculture Organization of United Nations (FAO).

Guerrero, C. M. M. (2010). La caprinocultura en México, una estrategia de desarrollo. Revista Universitaria Digital de Ciencias Sociales, 1(1), 160-171.

Herrera, P., García, M., Birbe, B., Colmenares, O., y Martínez, N. (2002). Aceptabilidad y consumo de bloques multinutricionales con follaje de frijol bayo (Vignaunguiculata, Walp). Revista Científica, XII(Supl. 2) 494-496.

Marchal, V. D. (2009). El Muérdago en la ciudad de México. ArbolAMA, 2, 10-30.

Mariscal, M. A., y Pérez, S. A. (2021). Contribuciones de la caprinocultura en la reconfiguración territorial de la Mixteca Oaxaqueña, México. (1500-2017). Textual, (78), 69-96. https://doi.org/10.5154/r.textual.2021.78.03

Martínez, M. E. (2010). Bloques multinutricionales elaborados con follaje de árboles como suplemento alimenticio de ovinos. Tesis. Maestría en Ciencias. Campus Veracruz. Colegio de Postgraduados. México.

Morand-Fehr, P., Boutonnet, J. P., Devendra, C., Dubeuf, J. P., Haenlein, G. F. W., Holst, P., Mowlem, L., y Capote, J. (2004). Strategy for goat farming in the 21st century. Small Ruminant Research, 51(2), 175-183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2003.08.013

Pittoff, W. (2004). Perspectives for goat production. Memorias de la XIX Reunión Nacional sobre Caprinocultura. Asociación Mexicana de Producción Caprina. A. C.

Press, M. C., y Phoenis, G. K. (2005). Impacts of parasitic plants on natural communities. New Phytologist, 166(3), 737-751. https:/doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01358.x

Robles, R. S., Margarito, L. A., Sánchez, L. R., y Licea, G. R. (2022). Evaluación nutritiva de bloques multinutricionales elaborados con frutos de Stenocereus griseus y S. stellatus, en sustitución de melaza de caña de azúcar / Nutritional evaluation of multinutritional blocks made with Stenocereus griseus and S. stellatus f. Braxilian Journal of Animal and Environmental Research, 5(1), 36-42. https://doi.org/10.34188/bjaerv5nl-004

Sansousy, R. (1986). Fabricación de bloques de melaza urea. Revista Mundial de Zootecnia, 57,40-48.

SAS Institute Inc. (2016). SAS/STAT user’s guide: versión 9.4. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.

Serrano, M. M. (2010). Evaluación de la actividad antioxidante para el aprovechamiento del muérdago que infesta la zona chinampera de Xochimilco. Tesis de Maestría en Ciencias. Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana. México.

Vazquez-Collazo, I., y Madrigal-Huendo, S. (2005). Control químico del muérdago enano (Areenthobium blobosum) en regeneración de Pinus pseudostrobus. Ciencia Nicolaita, 41, 69-82.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2022 Current Topics in Agronomic Science