Revista Chapingo Serie Ciencias Forestales y del Ambiente
Influence of fertilization on survival and growth of Pinus patula Schiede ex Schltdl. & Cham. under nursery and field conditions
ISSNe: 2007-4018   |   ISSN: 2007-3828
PDF

Keywords

seedling quality
plant production
morphological evaluation
controlled release fertilizer

How to Cite

Heras-Marcial, M., Aldrete, A., Gómez-Guerrero, A., & Rodríguez-Trejo, D. A. (2022). Influence of fertilization on survival and growth of Pinus patula Schiede ex Schltdl. & Cham. under nursery and field conditions. Revista Chapingo Serie Ciencias Forestales Y Del Ambiente, 29(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.5154/r.rchscfa.2022.03.019

##article.highlights##

  • Fertilizers of eight and 12 months of nutrient release were evaluated on Pinus patula.
  • The effect of fertilizer doses was significant on growth variables.
  • Survival ranged from 75 to 95 % one year after field planting.
  • The recommended nursery dose is 4 g∙L -1 of eight-month fertilizer and 4 g∙L -1 of 12-month release fertilizer.

Abstract

Introduction: The use of fertilizers for forest plant production in nursery improves quality and favors field performance.
Objective: To identify the effects of fertilizer doses on the growth of Pinus patula Schiede ex Schltdl. & Cham. under nursery conditions, and survival and growth under field conditions.
Materials and methods: A total of eight fertilization treatments with eight (Multicote Agri®) and 12 months (Multicote®) nutrient release times were evaluated at the GUMAIR nursery in Acaxochitlán, Hidalgo. Plants were established in the field and fertilization treatments were incorporated to evaluate survival and growth (height and diameter) after a year.
Results and discussion: Under nursery conditions, plants with 8 g∙L-1 of eight-month fertilizer in combination with 4 and 6 g∙L-1 of 12-month fertilizer release had the highest values (P ≤ 0.0001) in all variables. The combination of 4 g∙L-1 of eight-month fertilizer and 4 g∙L-1 of 12-month fertilizer release had the same effect as these treatments in diameter, root and shoot dry weight and Dickson’s quality index under nursery conditions, while under field conditions it caused higher survival (95 %) after a year of planting. The effect of these three treatments in the nursery agreed with the higher growth and N concentration in foliage under field conditions.
Conclusion: Plants with desired morphological characteristics and better field performance were obtained with 4 g∙L-1 of eight-month fertilizer and 4 g∙L-1 of 12-month release.

https://doi.org/10.5154/r.rchscfa.2022.03.019
PDF

References

Aguilera-Rodríguez, M., Aldrete, A., Vargas-Hernández, J. J.,López-Upton, J., López-López, M. A., & Ordaz-Chaparro, V. M. (2020). Crecimiento en campo de Pinus patula Schltdl. & Cham. como efecto de la poda radicular y los contenedores utilizados en vivero. Revista Chapingo Serie Ciencias Forestales y del Ambiente, 26(2), 307–319. doi: https://10.5154/r.rchscfa.2019.07.055

Alcántar, G. G., & Sandoval, V. M. (1999). Manual de análisis químico de tejido vegetal: Guía de muestreo, preparación, análisis e interpretación. Chapingo, México: Sociedad Mexicana de la Ciencia del Suelo - Universidad Autónoma Chapingo.

Binkley, D., & Fisher, R. F. (2019). Ecology and management of forest soils. USA: Jhon Wiley & Sons.

Comisión Nacional del Agua (CONAGUA). (2019). Normales climatológicas-Servicio Meteorológico Nacional. Retrieved from https://smn.conagua.gob.mx/es/climatologia/informacion-climatologica/normalesclimatologicas-por-estado

Comisión Nacional Forestal (CONAFOR). (2018). Informe de autoevaluación enero-diciembre de 2018. Retrieved from http://www.conafor.gob.mx:8080/documentos/docs/1/7635Informe%20de%20autoevaluaci%C3%B3n%20enero%20diciembre%202018.pdf

Duryea, M. L. (1985). Evaluating seedling quality: principles, procedures, and predictive abilities of major tests. Corvallis, OR, USA: Oregon State University.

Escobar-Alonso, S., & Rodríguez-Trejo, D. A. (2019). Estado del arte en la investigación sobre calidad de planta del género Pinus en México. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Forestales, 10(55), 4–38. doi: https://10.29298/rmcf.v10i55.558

Fu, Y., Oliet, J. A., Li, G., & Wang, J. (2017). Effect of controlled release fertilizer type and rate on mineral nutrients, non-structural carbohydrates, and field performance of Chinese pine container-grown seedlings. Silva Fennica, 51(2), article ID 1607. doi: https://10.14214/sf.1607

Grossnickle, S. C., & MacDonald, J. E. (2018). Seedling quality: History, application, and plant attributes. Forests, 9, 283. doi: https://10.3390/f9050283

Haase, D. L., Rose, R., & Trobaugh, J. (2006). Field performance of three stock sizes of Douglas-fir container seedlings grown with slow-release fertilizer in the nursery growing medium. New Forests, 31, 1–24. doi: https://10.1007/s11056-004-5396-6

Jackson, D. P., Dumroese, R. K., & Barnett, J. P. (2012). Nursery response of container Pinus palustris seedlings to nitrogen supply and subsequent effects on outplanting performance. Forest Ecology and Management, 265, 1–12. doi: https://10.1016/j.foreco.2011.10.018

Landis, T. D., Dumroese, R. K., & Haase, D. L. (2010). The container tree nursery manual. Seedling processing, storage and outplanting (vol. 7). Washington, DC, USA: USDA Forest Service. Retrieved from https://rngr.net/publications/ctnm/volume-7

Landis, T. D., & Dumroese, R. K. (2009). Using polymer-coated controlled-release fertilizers in the nursery and after outplanting. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237372027_Using_Polymer-coated_Controlled-release_Fertilizers_in_the_Nursery_and_After_Outplanting

Mexal, J. G., Cuevas, R. R. A., & Landis, T. D. (2008). Reforestation success in central Mexico: factors determining survival and early growth. Tree Planters’ Notes, 53, 16–22. Retrieved from https://rngr.net/publications/tpn/index_html

Oliet, J. A., Puértolas, J., Planelles, R., & Jacobs, D. F. (2013). Nutrient loading of forest tree seedlings to promote stress resistance and field performance: a Mediterranean perspective. New Forests, 44, 649–669. doi: https://10.1007/s11056-013-9382-8

Prieto, R. J. A., & Sáenz, R. J. T. (2011). Indicadores de calidad de planta en viveros forestales de la Sierra Madre Occidental. Libro técnico núm. 3. Durango México: Campo Experimental Valle del Guadiana, Centro de Investigación Regional Norte Centro, INIFAP.

Prieto, R. J. A., García, R. J. L., & Mejía, B. J. M., Huchin, A. S., & Aguilar, V. J. L. (2009). Producción de planta del género Pinus en vivero en clima templado frío. Durango, México: Campo Experimental Valle del Guadiana, Centro de Investigación Regional Norte Centro, INIFAP.

Rodríguez, T. D. A. (2008). Indicadores de calidad de planta forestal. México: Mundi Prensa.

Rose, R., Haase, D., & Arellano, E. (2004). Fertilizantes de entrega controlada: potencial para mejorar la productividad de la reforestación. Bosque, 25(2), 89–100. doi: https://10.4067/s0717-92002004000200009

Rueda, S., A., Benavides, S. J. de D., Sáenz, R. J. T., Muñoz, F. H. J., Prieto, R J. A., & Orozco, G. G. (2014). Calidad de planta producida en los viveros forestales de Nayarit. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Forestales, 5(22), 58–73. doi: https://10.29298/rmcf.v5i22.350

Sáenz, J. T. R., Villaseñor, R. F. J., Muñoz, F. H. J., Rueda, S. A., & Prieto, R. J. A. (2010). Calidad de planta en viveros forestales de clima templado en Michoacán. Uruapan, Michoacán, México: Campo Experimental Uruapan, Centro de Investigación Regional Pacífico Centro, INIFAP. Retrieved from https://docplayer.es/17222741-Calidad-de-planta-en-viveros-forestales-de-climatemplado-en-michoacan.html

Secretaría de Economía. (2014). Norma Mexicana NMX-AA-170-SCFI-2014. Certificación de la operación de viveros forestales. México: Diario Oficial de la Federación. Retrieved from https://biblioteca.semarnat.gob.mx/janium/Documentos/Ciga/agenda/DOFsr/DO3430.pdf

Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales (SEMARNAT). (2002). Norma Oficial Mexicana NOM-021-RECNAT-2000, Que establece las especificaciones de fertilidad, salinidad y clasificación de suelos. Estudios, muestreo y análisis. México: Diario Oficial de la Federación. Retrieved from http://www.ordenjuridico.gob.mx/Documentos/Federal/wo69255.pdf

Sloan, J. L., & Jacobs, D. F. (2013). Fertilization at planting influences seedling growth and vegetative competition on a post-mining boreal reclamation site. New Forests, 44, 687–701. doi: https://10.1007/s11056-013-9378-4

Sosa-Pérez G., & Rodríguez-Trejo, D. A. (2003). Efecto de la calidad de planta en la supervivencia y crecimiento de Pinus patula en un área quemada. Revista Chapingo Serie Ciencias Forestales y del Ambiente, 9(1), 36–43. Retrieved from https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/629/62990104.pdf

Trubat, R., Cortina, J., & Vilagrosa, A. (2010). Nursery fertilization affects seedling traits but not field performance in Quercus suber L. Journal of Arid Environments, 74(4), 491–497. doi: https://10.1016/j.jaridenv.2009.10.007

Wells, C., & Allen, L. (1985). A loblolly pine management guide: When and where to apply fertilizer. doi: https://10.2737/SE-GTR-36

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2022 Universidad Autónoma Chapingo