Revista Chapingo Serie Ciencias Forestales y del Ambiente
Range site and condition effects on “escamoles” ant (Liometopum apiculatum Mayr) nest density
ISSNe: 2007-4018   |   ISSN: 2007-3828
PDF
ePUB

Keywords

Ant nest density
land tenure
vegetation and soil state
San Luis Potosí highland

How to Cite

Lara-Juárez, P., Castillo-Lara, P., Tristán-Patiño, F. de M. ., Rendón-Huerta, J. A. ., & Aguirre-Rivera, J. R. . (2016). Range site and condition effects on “escamoles” ant (Liometopum apiculatum Mayr) nest density. Revista Chapingo Serie Ciencias Forestales Y Del Ambiente, 22(3), 285–302. https://doi.org/10.5154/r.rchscfa.2015.04.016

Abstract

The aim of this work was to evaluate the effect of rangeland condition on the nest density of escamoles ant (Liometopum apiculatum) in three different range sites, all within a single (escamoles) collecting area divided into two contrasting use and property regimes, communal and private, in the Municipality of Charcas, San Luis Potosi, Mexico. In order to measure the vegetation, a point-centered quarter method along transects was used; in every quadrant the distance from the point to the closest plant was measured for each vegetation stratum, while the distance to the closest nest (if existing) was also recorded. The species recorded were grouped according to their forage value as desirable, less desirable and undesirable, and using their density and volumetric biomass estimations, these groups were compared through a tabular and descriptive statistical analysis. The soil surface state was evaluated with the line intercept method, in its proportion of live and dead (mulch) basal cover, bare soil, stones, ant trails and feces. The highest density of ant nests (14·ha-1) was recorded in the favorable site of the ranch (best rangeland condition). Marked differences were found in nest density between adjacent rangeland sites, which in turn were severely altered by the condition of these rangelands

https://doi.org/10.5154/r.rchscfa.2015.04.016
PDF
ePUB

References

Bestelmeyer, B. T., & Wiens, J. A. (1996). The effect of land use on the structure of ground-foraging ant communities in the Argentina Chaco. Ecological Applications, 6, 1225–1240. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/2269603

Bestelmeyer, B. T., & Wiens, J. A. (2001). Local and regional-scale responses of ant diversity to a semiarid biome transition. Ecography, 24, 381–392. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2001.tb00473.x

Bolaños, A., & Aguirre, J. R. (2000). Evaluación preliminar de los agostaderos del occidente del estado de México. Acta Científica Potosina, 15(2), 74‒97.

Brower, J. E., Zar, J. H., & von Ende, C. N. (1998). Field and laboratory methods for general ecology (4th ed.). Boston, Massachusetts, USA: WCB Inc McGraw-Hill.

Campbell, W. B., Jarillo-Rodríguez, J., López-Ortiz, S., & Castillo-Gallegos, E. (2013). Does stocking rate manipulation promote pasture sustainability in the humid tropics? Rangeland Ecology and Management, 66, 348–355. doi: https://doi.org/10.2111/REM-D-11-00110.1

DelCurto, T., Porath, M., Parsons, C. T., & Morrison, J. A. (2005). Management strategies for sustainable beef cattle grazing on forested rangelands in the Pacific Northwest. Rangeland Ecology and Management, 58, 119–127. doi: https://doi.org/10.2111/1551-5028(2005)58<119:MSFSBC>2.0.CO;2

Fulbright, T. E., Lozano-Cavazos, E. A., Ruthven III, D. C., & Litt, A. R. (2013). Plant and small vertebrate composition and diversity 36–39 years after root plowing. Rangeland Ecology and Management, 66, 19-25. doi: https://doi.org/10.2111/REM-D-12-00008.1

García, E. (2004). Modificaciones al sistema de clasificación climática de Köppen. México: Instituto de Geografía, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.

Griffin, G. (2002). Indigenous people in rangelands. In A. C. Grice, & K. C. Hodgkinson (Eds.), Global rangelands: Progress and prospects (pp. 29-41). Wallingford, Oxon, UK: CABI.

Heady, H. F., & Child, R. D. (1994). Rangeland ecology and management. Boulder, Colorado, USA: Westview Press.

Hoffmann, B. (2000). Changes in ant species composition and community organization along grazing gradients in semi-arid rangelands of the Northern territory. Rangeland Journal, 22, 171–189. doi: https://doi.org/10.1071/RJ0000171

Holechek, J. L., Pieper, R. D., & Herbel, C. H. (2011). Range management (6th ed.). River, New Jersey, USA: Prentice Hall.

Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía (INEGI). (2002). Síntesis de información geográfica del estado de San Luis Potosí. Aguascalientes, México: Autor.

Lara-Juárez, P., Aguirre, R. J. R., Castillo-Lara, P., & Reyes- Agüero, J. A. (2015). Biología y aprovechamiento de la hormiga de escamoles, Liometopum apiculatum (Hymenoptera:Formicidae). Acta Zoológica Mexicana, 31, 251-264. http://www.scielo.org.mx/pdf/azm/v31n2/v31n2a12.pdf

Milton, S. J., & Dean, W. R. J. (2010). Plant invasions in arid areas: Special problems and solutions: A South African perspective. Biological Invasions, 12, 3935–3948. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-010-9820-x

Nash, M. S., Whitford, W. G., Bradford, D. F., Franson, S. E., Neale, A. C., & Heggem, D. T. (2001). Ant communities and livestock grazing in the Great Basin, USA. Journal of Arid Environments, 49, 695–710. doi: https://doi.org/10.1006/jare.2001.0824

Odum, E. P. & Sarmiento, F. O. (1998). Ecología. México: McGraw-Hill Interamericana.

Quirk, M. (2002). Managing grazing. In A. C. Grice, & K. C. Hodgkinson (Eds.), Global rangelands: Progress and prospects (pp. 131-145). Wallingford, Oxon, UK: CABI.

Ramírez, M., & Enríquez, M. L. (2003). Importance and diversity of ants in silvopastoral systems in the Cauca Valley, Colombia. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 15(1), article 5. http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd15/1/rami151.htm

Ramos-Elorduy, J. (2006). Threatened edible insects in Hidalgo, Mexico and some measures to preserve them. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, 2, 51. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-4269-2-51

Rivera, L. F., Armbrecht, I., & Calle, Z. (2013). Silvopastoral systems and ant diversity conservation in a cattle-dominated landscape of the Colombian Andes. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 181, 188–194. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2013.09.011

Rojas, P., & Fragoso, C. (2000). Composition, diversity, and distribution of a Chihuahuan Desert ant community (Mapimí, México). Journal of Arid Environments, 44, 213– 227. doi: https://doi.org/10.1006/jare.1999.0583

Statistical Analysis System (SAS Institute). (1999). User’s guide: Statistics (CD/ROM Computer file) 8th version. Cary, NC, USA: Author.

Thurow, T. L. (2000). Hydrologic effects on rangeland degradation and restoration processes. In O. Arnalds, & S. Archer (Eds.), Rangeland desertification (pp. 53–66). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Vallentine, J. F. (1990). Grazing management. San Diego, California, USA: Academic Press.

Whitford, W. G., Barness, G., & Steinberger, Y. (2008). Effects of three species of Chihuahuan Desert ants on annual plants and soil properties. Journal of Arid Environments, 72, 392–400. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2007.07.012

Whitford, W. G., & Steinberger, Y. (2011). Herbivore–plant interactions and desertification in arid land. In J. Seckbach, and Z. Dubinsky (Eds.), All f lesh is grass, cellular origin, life in extreme habitats and astrobiology (pp. 237–256). New York, USA: Springer. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9316-5_11

Zimmermann, H. (2010). Managing prickly pear invasions in South Africa. In A. Nefzaoui, P. Inglese, & T. Belay (Eds.), Improved utilization of cactus pear for food, feed, soil and water conservation and other products in Africa (pp. 157–165). Mekelle, Ethiopia: Proceedings of International Workshop. http://www.cactusnet.org/documents/Issue12.pdf

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2016 Revista Chapingo Serie Ciencias Forestales y del Ambiente