Revista Chapingo Serie Ciencias Forestales y del Ambiente
RADIAL DISTANCE FROM WATER SOURCES, HIDING COVER AND COYOTE (Canis latrans) SIGNS ASSOCIATED WITH THE PRESENCE OF WHITE-TAILED DEER (Odocoileus virginianus)
ISSNe: 2007-4018   |   ISSN: 2007-3828
PDF

Keywords

wildlife
cervids
habitat
plant density

How to Cite

Villarreal-Espino-Barros, O. A. ., Plata-Pérez, F. X. ., Mendoza-Martínez, G. D. ., Martínez-García, J. A. ., Hernández-García, P. A. ., & Arcos-García, J. L. . (2012). RADIAL DISTANCE FROM WATER SOURCES, HIDING COVER AND COYOTE (Canis latrans) SIGNS ASSOCIATED WITH THE PRESENCE OF WHITE-TAILED DEER (Odocoileus virginianus). Revista Chapingo Serie Ciencias Forestales Y Del Ambiente, 18(2), 231–239. https://doi.org/10.5154/r.rchscfa.2011.01.012

Abstract

The effect of radial distance from water sources (RDW) on plant volume, hiding cover (HC) and the presence of white-tailed deer was assessed. The study was conducted in the state of Puebla, Mexico. Stratified random sampling was used to select five areas with a RDW of less than 800 m, four between 800-1,600 m and four greater than 1,600 m. Plant volume was estimated in these areas and they were the starting point of transects in which HC and the number of white-tailed deer and coyote fecal pellet groups (PGs) were estimated. The number of white-tailed deer PGs increased as the RDW increased (Tukey; P < 0.05), while coyote PGs remained within the 800-m radius (X2 = 0.004). The RDW did not affect HC (Tukey, P > 0.05). The relationship between RDW, HC and PGs was established using Poisson and polynomial regression. Poisson regression showed that RDW and HC significantly changed (X2; P < 0.0004 and P < 0.0001) the PG number. The polynomial equation showed that HC has a good correlation (R2 = 0.72) with PGs.

https://doi.org/10.5154/r.rchscfa.2011.01.012
PDF

References

Arriaga, L., Espinoza, J. M., Aguilar, C., Martínez, E., Gómez, L., & Loa, E. (2000). Regiones terrestres prioritarias de México. México: Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad http://www.conabio.gob.mx/conocimiento/regionalizacion/doctos/terrestres.html

Avey, J. T., Ballard, W. B., Wallace M. C., Humphrey, M. H., Krausman, P. R., Harwell, F., & Fish, E. B. (2003). Habitat relationships between sympatric mule deer and white-tailed deer in Texas. The Southwestern Naturalist, 48(53), 644–653. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3672776

Bello, J., Gallina, S., Equihua, M., Mandujano, S., & Delfin, C. (2001). Activity areas and distance to water sources by White-tailed deer in northeastern Mexico. Vida Silvestre Neotropical, 10(1–2), 30–37. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4003582

Borosky, B. B., & Mossman, A. R. (1996). Distribution of mule deer in relation to water sources in northern California. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 60(4), 770–776. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3802376

DePerno, C. S., Jenks, J. A., Griffin, S. I., Rice, L. A., & Higgins, K. F. (2002). White-tailed deer habitats in the central black hills. Journal of Range Management, 55(3), 242– 252. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4003130

DePerno, C. S., Jenks, J. A., & Griffin, S. L. (2003). Multidimensional Cover Characteristics: Is Variation in Habitat Selection Related to White-Tailed Deer Sexual Segregation? Journal of Mammalogy, 84(4), 1316–1329. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1384018

DeStefano, S. S., Schmidt, L., & Devos Jr. J. C. (2000). Observations of predator activity at wildlife water developments in southern Arizona. Journal of Range Management, 53, 255–258. www.jstor.org/stable/4003428

Dodd, M. B., & Lauenroth, W. K. (1997). The influence of soil texture on the soil water dynamics and vegetation structure of a shortgrass steppe ecosystem. Plant Ecology, 133, 13–28. doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009759421640

Epaphras, A. M., Gereta, E., Lejora, I. A., Ole Meing’ataki, G. E., Ng’umbi, G., Kiwango, Y., …Mtahiko, M. G. G. (2008). Wildlife water utilization and importance of artificial wa¬terholes during dry season at Ruaha National Park, Tanzania. Wetlands Ecology Management, 16, 183–188. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-007-9065-3

Griffith, B., & Youtie, B. A. (1988). Two devices for estimating foliage density and deer hiding cover. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 16(2), 206–210. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3782191

Hirata, M., Oishi, K., Muramatu, K., Xiong, Y., Kaihotu, I., Nishiwaki, A., …Hongo, A. (2007). Estimation of plant biomass and plant water mass through dimensional measurements of plant volume in the Dund-Govi Province, Mongolia. Grassland Science, 53, 217–225. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-697X.2007.00096.x

López-Téllez, M. C., Mandujano, S., & G. (2007). Evaluación poblacional del Venado Cola Blanca en un bosque tropical seco de la mixteca poblana. Acta Zoológica Mexicana, (n.s.) 23, 1–16. http://redalyc.uaemex.mx/pdf/575/57523301.pdf

Mandujano, S., Gallina, S., Arceo, G., & Pérez, L. A. (2004). Variación estacional del uso y preferencia de los tipos vegetacionales por el Venado Cola Blanca en un bosque tropical de Jalisco. Acta Zoológica Mexicana (ns) 20, 45–67. http://redalyc.uaemex.mx/pdf/575/57520204.pdf

Marshal, J. P., Krausman, P. R., Bleich, V. C., Rosenstock, S. S., & Ballard, W. B. (2006). Gradients of forage biomass and ungulate use near wildlife water developments. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 34, 620–626. doi: https://doi.org/10.2193/0091-7648(2006)34[620:GOFBAU]2.0.CO;2

Martínez-Ruiz, C., Fernández-Santos, B., & Gómez-Gutiérrez, J. M. (2001). Effects of substrate coarseness and exposure on plant succession in uranium-mining wastes. Plant Ecology, 155, 79–89. doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013208305393

Medina, T. S. M., García, M. E., Márquez, O. M., Vaquera, H. H., Romero, M. A., & Martínez, M. M. (2008). Factores que influyen en el uso del hábitat por el Venado Cola Blanca (Odocoileus virginianus couesi) en la sierra del laurel, Aguascalientes, México. Acta Zoológica Mexicana (n.s.) 24, 191–212. http://redalyc.uaemex.mx/pdf/575/57524312.pdf

Mysterud, A., & Østbye, E. (1999). Cover as a habitat element for temperate ungulates: Effects on habitat selection and demography. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 27, 385–394. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3783905

Ortíz-Martínez, T., Gallina, S., Briones, S. M., & González, S. (2005). Densidad poblacional y caracterización del hábitat del Venado Cola Blanca (Odocoileus virginianus Oaxacensis, Goldman y Kellog, 1940) en un bosque templado de la sierra norte de Oaxaca, México. Acta Zoológica Mexicana (n.s.) 2, 65–78. http://redalyc.uaemex.mx/src/inicio/ArtPdfRed.jsp?iCve=57521302

Patterson, B. R., & Power, V. A. (2002). Contributions of forage competition, harvest, and climate fluctuation to changes in population growth of northern white-tailed deer. Oeco¬logia, 130, 62–71. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420100783

Rámirez-Lozano, R. G. (2004). Nutrición del Venado Cola Blanca. Monterrey, Nuevo León, México: Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León-Unión Ganadera Regional de Nuevo León-Fundación PRODUCE Nuevo León, A.C.

Ratti, J. T., & Garton, E. O. (1996). Research and experimental design. In T. A. Bookhout (Ed.), Research and man-agement techniques for wildlife and habitats (pp. 1–23). Bethesda, Maryland, USA: The Wildlife Society.

Rosenstock, S. S., Ballard, W. B., Devos Jr., J. C. (1999). Viewpoint: Benefits and impacts of wildlife water developments. Journal of Range Management, 52, 302–311.

Rzedowski, J. (2006). Vegetación de México (1ra ed. digital). México: Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Diversidad.

Sall, J., Creighton, L., & Lehman, A. (2007). JMP Start Statis¬tics: A guide to statistics and data analysis using JMP (4a ed.). CA, U.S.A: Duxbury Press.

Villarreal, E. B. O. A., & Marín F. M. M. (2005). Agua de origen vegetal para el Venado Cola Blanca mexicano. Archivos de Zootecnia, 54, 191–196. http://redalyc.uaemex.mx/pdf/495/49520712.pdf

Villarreal, E. B. O. A. (2006). El venado cola blanca en la Mixteca poblana. Conceptos y métodos para su conservación y manejo. Puebla, México: Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla.

Villarreal, G. J. G. (1999). Venado Cola Blanca, manejo y aprovechamiento cinegético. Monterrey, Nuevo León, México: Unión Ganadera Regional de Nuevo León

Yu, M., Gao, Q., Epstein, H. E., & Zhang, X. (2008). An ecohydrological analysis for optimal use of redistributed water among vegetation. Ecological Applications, 18, 1679–1688 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18839763

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2012 Revista Chapingo Serie Ciencias Forestales y del Ambiente