Revista Chapingo Serie Ciencias Forestales y del Ambiente
Changes in regulating ecosystem services and their relationship with land use changes in the Argentina Pampas
ISSNe: 2007-4018   |   ISSN: 2007-3828
PDF

Keywords

carbon storage
flood regulation
ecosystem functions
climate regulation
grassland replacement

How to Cite

Lara, B., Gandini, M., & Salese, S. . (2023). Changes in regulating ecosystem services and their relationship with land use changes in the Argentina Pampas. Revista Chapingo Serie Ciencias Forestales Y Del Ambiente, 29(3), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.5154/r.rchscfa.2022.10.073

##article.highlights##

  • Changes in five functions and two ecosystem services between 2001 and 2018 were evaluated.
  • Precipitation retention by the cover (40.7 %) and erosion control (35.4 %) decreased.
  • Flood regulation and climate regulation decreased 6.78 % and 6.80 %, respectively.
  • Decrease in ecosystem services was associated with replacement of natural grasslands by cropland.

Abstract

Introduction: Land use changes represent the factor with the greatest impact on terrestrial ecosystems. The conceptual framework of ecosystem services allows understanding how changes in ecosystems affect human well-being.
Objective: To evaluate changes in five key ecosystem functions and two key ecosystem services in the Argentina Pampas between 2001 and 2018, and to analyze their relationship with land use changes.
Materials and methods: Five ecosystem functions (soil organic carbon storage, biomass carbon storage, erosion control, soil fertility and retention of excess precipitation by vegetation cover) and two regulating ecosystem services (flood regulation and climate regulation) were mapped from 2001-2018 using biophysical models. The main land uses were characterized based on remote sensing data.
Results and discussion: Ecosystem functions, except for biomass carbon storage, decreased at the regional scale between 2001 and 2018; precipitation retention by cover (40.7 %) and erosion control (35.4 %) decreased the most. Also, the ecosystem services of flood regulation and climate regulation decreased 6.78 % and 6.8 %, respectively. The spatial patterns of decrease in the levels of provision of these services were associated with the replacement of natural grasslands by cropland.
Conclusions: The use of biophysical models allowed us to analyze, spatially, the dynamics of regulating ecosystem services and to evaluate their relationship with land use changes.

https://doi.org/10.5154/r.rchscfa.2022.10.073
PDF

References

Aliaga, V. S., Ferrelli, F., Alberdi-Algañaraz, E. D., Bohn, V., & Piccolo, M. C. (2016). Distribución y variabilidad de la precipitación en la región pampeana, Argentina. Cuadernos de Investigación Geográfica, 42(1), 261‒280. https://doi.org/10.18172/cig.2867

Arrieta, E. M., Cuchietti, A., Cabrol, D., & González, A. D. (2018). Greenhouse gas emissions and energy efficiencies for soybeans and maize cultivated in different agronomic zones: a case study of Argentina. Science of the Total Environment, 625,199‒208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.286

Baeza, S., & Paruelo, J. M. (2020). Land use/land cover change (2000-2014) in the Rio de la Plata grasslands: an analysis based on MODIS NDVI time series. Remote Sensing, 12(3), 381. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12030381

Balvanera, P., Uriarte, M, Almeida-Leñero, L., Altesor, A., DeClerck, F., Gardner, T., Hall, J., Lara, A., Laterra, P., Peña-Claros, M., Silva Matos, D. M., Vogl, A. L., Romero-Duque, L. P., Arreola, L. F., Caro-Borrero, A. P., Gallego, F., Jain, M., Little, C., …Vallejos, M. (2012). Ecosystem services research in Latin America: the state of the art. Ecosystem Services, 2, 56‒70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.09.006

Bennett, E. M., Cramer, W., Begossi, A., Cundill, G., Díaz, S., Egoh, B. N., Geijzendorffer, I. R., Krug, C. B., Lavorel, S., Lazos, E., Lebel, L., Martín-López, B., Meyfroidt, P., Mooney, H. A., Nel, J. L., Pascual, U., Payet, K., Pérez Harguindeguy, N., Peterson, G. D., …Woodward, G. (2015). Linking biodiversity, ecosystem services, and human well-being: three challenges for designing research for sustainability. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 14, 76‒85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2015.03.007

Bert, F., de Estrada, M., Naumann, G., Negri, R., Podestá, G., Skansi, M., Spennemann, P., & Quesada, M. (2021). The 2017-18 drought in the Argentine Pampas - impacts on agriculture. https://www.preventionweb.net/files/78456_cs1.14laplataargentinafinal20210215.pdf

Carreño, L., Frank, F. C., & Viglizzo, E. F. (2012). Tradeoffs between economic and ecosystem services in Argentina during 50 years of land-use change. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 154, 68‒77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2011.05.019

Celleri, C., Zapperi, G., González Trilla, G., & Pratolongo, P. (2018). Spatial and temporal patterns of rainfall variability and its relationship with land surface phenology in central east Argentina. International Journal of Climatology, 38(10), 3963‒3975. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.5547

Cruzate, G. A., & Casas, R. (2016). Balance de nutrientes en los suelos agrícolas de la Argentina en la campaña 2015/16. Informaciones Agronómicas de Hispanoamérica, 28, 14‒23. http://www.ipni.net/publication/ia-lahp.nsf/0/3C5A42102BE9AAF58525821E005CBD64/$FILE/Art%203.pdf

ECOSER. (2022). ECO-SER: Protocolo colaborativo de evaluación y mapeo de servicios ecosistémicos y vulnerabilidad socio-ecológica para el ordenamiento territorial. www.eco-ser.com.ar

Fisher, B., Turner, R., & Morling, P. (2009). Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making. Ecological Economics, 68(3), 643‒653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecole con.2008.09.014

Forján, H., & Manso, L. (2012). La secuencia de cultivos. In H. Forján, & L. Manso (Eds.), Rotaciones y secuencias de cultivos en la región mixta cerealera del centro-sur bonaerense: 30 años de experiencias (pp. 25‒34). Ediciones INTA.

Gandini, M., Lara, B., Moreno, L., Cañibano, A., & Gandini, P. (2019). Trends in fragmentation and connectivity of Paspalum quadrifarium grasslands in the Buenos Aires province, Argentina. PeerJ, 7, e6450. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.6450

Gorelick, N., Hancher, M., Dixon, M., Ilyushchenko, S., Thau, D., & Moore, R. (2017). Google Earth Engine: Planetary-scale geospatial analysis for everyone. Remote Sensing of Environment, 202, 18‒27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.06.031

Guevara-Ochoa, C., Lara, B., Vives, L., Zimmermann, E., & Gandini, M. (2018). Una metodología para la caracterización del uso del suelo mediante imágenes de media resolución espacial. Revista Chapingo Series Ciencias Forestales y del Ambiente, 24(2), 207‒2018. https://doi.org/10.5154/r.rchscfa.2017.10.061

Haines-Young, R., & Potschin, M. (2010). The links between biodiversity, ecosystem services and human well-being. In Raffaelli, D., & Frid, C. (Eds.), Ecosystem ecology: A new synthesis (Ch. 7). BES Ecological Reviews Series-CUP Cambridge.

Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). (1990). Atlas de suelos de la República Argentina. Secretaría de Agricultura, Ganadería y Pesca.

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2013). Working group I contribution of the fifth assessment report. Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Cambridge University Press. http://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/wg1/

IPCC. (2006). 2006 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. Institute for Global Environmental Strategies. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/2006-ipcc-guidelines-for-national-greenhouse-gas-inventories/

Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES). (2019). Summary for policymakers of the global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the IPBES. https://www.ipbes.net/system/tdf/spm_global_unedited_advance.pdf?file=1&type=node&id=35245

Lara, B., & Gandini, M. (2014). Quantifying the land cover changes and fragmentation patterns in the Argentina Pampas, in the last 37 years (1974-2011). GeoFocus. Revista Internacional de Ciencia y Tecnología de la Información Geográfica, 14, 63‒180. https://www.geofocus.org/index.php/geofocus/article/view/306

Lara, B., Gandini, M., Gantes, P., & Matteucci, S. (2018). Regional patterns of ecosystem functional diversity in the Argentina Pampas using MODIS time-series. Ecological Informatics, 43, 65‒72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2017.11.004

Lara, B., Gandini, M., Gantes, P., & Matteucci, S. (2020). Trends and land surface phenological responses to climate variability in the Argentina Pampas. Cuadernos de Investigación Geográfica, 46(2), 581‒602. https://doi.org/10.18172/cig.4310

Lara, B., Gandini, M., Matteucci, S., & Scaramuzzino, R. (2019). Cambios en el funcionamiento de los ecosistemas de la región pampeana en los últimos 20 años: indicios del impacto del cambio global. Revista de la Asociación Argentina de Ecología de Paisajes, 9(1), 81‒84. https://d1e074e619.clvaw-cdnwnd.com/3cfd20b93af41ab30f4d34afad6c23cb/200000100-03c7e03c81/20_Lara_CAEP_cambios%20%281%29.pdf?ph=d1e074e619

Mastrangelo, M. E., Weyland, F., Herrera, L., Villarino, S., Barral, M. P., & Auer, A. (2015). Ecosystem services research in contrasting socio-ecological contexts of Argentina: critical assessment and future directions. Ecosystem Services, 16, 63‒73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.10.001

Matteucci, S. (2012). Ecorregión Pampa. In J. Morello, S. Matteucci, A. Rodríguez, & M. Silva (Eds.), Ecorregiones y complejos ecosistémicos argentinos (pp. 391‒446). Orientación Gráfica Editora. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Silvia-Matteucci-2/publication/268447092_Ecorregiones_y_complejos_ecosistemicos_Argentinos/links/598333be0f7e9b2ac353f62e/Ecorregiones-y-complejos-ecosistemicos-Argentinos.pdf

Nelson, E. J., & Daily, G. C. (2010). Modelling ecosystem services in terrestrial systems. F1000 Biology Reports, 2(53). https://doi.org/10.3410/B2-53

Nosetto, M. D., Paez, R., Ballesteros, S., & Jobbágy, E. (2015). Higher water-table levels and flooding risk under grain vs. livestock production systems in the subhumid plains of the Pampas. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 206, 60‒70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2015.03.009

Paruelo, J. M., Texeira, M., Staiano, L., Mastrángelo, M., Amdan, L., & Gallego, F. (2016). An integrative index of ecosystem services provision based on remotely sensed data. Ecological Indicators, 71, 145‒154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.06.054

Pinilla, A., Guevara, C., Lara, B., & Kruse, E. (2019). Impactos de los cambios de uso del suelo sobre la recarga subterránea en una zona de llanura. Caso de estudio, cuenca superior del arroyo Del Azul. Revista de la Asociación Argentina de Ecología de Paisajes, 9(1), 40‒44. https://d1e074e619.clvaw-cdnwnd.com/3cfd20b93af41ab30f4d34afad6c23cb/200000091-59ed959edb/10_Pinilla_CAEP_azul%20%281%29.pdf?ph=d1e074e619

Schipanski, M. E., & Bennet, E. M. (2012). The influence of agricultural trade and livestock production on the global phosphorus cycle. Ecosystems, 15, 256‒268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-011-9507-x

Sirimarco, X., Barral, M. P., Villarino, S., & Laterra, P. (2018). Water regulation by grasslands: a global meta-analysis. Ecohydrology, 11(4), e1934. https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.1934

Villa, F., Bagstad, K. J., Voigt, B., Johnson, G. W., Portela, R., Honzak, M., & Batker, D. (2014). A methodology for adaptable and robust ecosystem services assessment. PLoS ONE, 9(3), e91001. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0091001

Volante, J., Alcaraz-Segura, D., Mosciaro, M. J., Viglizzo, E. F., & Paruelo, J. M. (2012). Ecosystem functional changes associated with land clearing in NW Argentina. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 154, 12‒22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2011.08.012

Weyland, F., Mastrangelo, M., Auer, A., Barral, M. P., Nahuelhual, L., Larrazábal, A., Parera, A., Berrouet Cadavid, L. M., López-Gómez, C. P., & Villegas Palacio, C. (2019). Ecosystem services approach in Latin America: from theoretical promises to real applications. Ecosystem Services, 35, 280‒293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.11.010

Weyland, F., Barral, M. P., & Laterra, P. (2017). Assessing the relationship between ecosystem functions and services: importance of local ecological conditions. Ecological Indicators, 81, 201‒213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.05.062

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Chapingo Serie Ciencias Forestales y del Ambiente