Revista Chapingo Serie Ciencias Forestales y del Ambiente
Survival of plants of Pinus leiophylla Schiede ex Schltdl. & Cham., by adding water reservoirs at transplanting in a greenhouse
ISSNe: 2007-4018   |   ISSN: 2007-3828
PDF
ePUB

Keywords

phenolic foam
hydrogel
drought resistance
reforestation

How to Cite

Palacios-Romero, A., Rodríguez-Laguna, R. ., Razo-Zárate, R. ., Meza-Rangel, J. ., Prieto-García, F. ., & Hernández-Flores, M. de la L. . (2016). Survival of plants of Pinus leiophylla Schiede ex Schltdl. & Cham., by adding water reservoirs at transplanting in a greenhouse. Revista Chapingo Serie Ciencias Forestales Y Del Ambiente, 23(1), 35–45. https://doi.org/10.5154/r.rchscfa.2015.10.046

Abstract

In Mexico, several reforestation programs have been launched; they generally fail to achieve good survival rates, mainly due to drought. To mitigate this, technologies that help plants survive in the early years should be generated. In light of this, the effect of adding water reservoirs at transplanting on survival, height, diameter and biomass of Pinus leiophylla plants, grown under simulated drought conditions in a greenhouse, was evaluated. Plants were arranged in a completely randomized design and four treatments were used: control, a 231-cc phenolic foam block, a 308-cc phenolic foam block and three grams of hydrogel, all hydrated with tap water. A survival analysis was performed, yielding significant difference between control and the other treatments (P = 0.000008). No statistically significant differences were found in height. Statistically significant differences were found in diameter among treatments at 8 (P = 0.013) and 12 weeks (P = 0.002). Statistically significant differences were detected in biomass among treatments (P = 0.0001). Adding hydrated opencell phenolic foam at transplanting significantly increased survival time and diameter of P. leiophylla under drought conditions.

https://doi.org/10.5154/r.rchscfa.2015.10.046
PDF
ePUB

References

Agaba, H., Baguma, O. L. J., Osoto, E. J. F., Obua, J., Kabasa, J. D., & Hüttermann, A. (2010). Effects of hydrogel amendment to different soils on plant available water and survival of trees under drought conditions. CLEAN – Soil, Air, Water, 38(4), 328–335. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/clen.200900245

Ahmed, E. M. (2013). Hydrogel: Preparation, characterization, and applications. Journal of Advanced Research, 6(2), 105-121. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2013.07.006

Akhter, J., Mahmood, K., Malik, K. A., Mardan, A., Ahmad, M., & Iqbal, M. M. (2004). Effects of hydrogel amendment on water storage of sandy loam and loam soils and seedling growth of barley, wheat and chickpea. Plant Soil Environment, 50(10), 463–469. http://www.agriculturejournals.cz/publicFiles/52788.pdf

Al-Humaid, A. I., & Moftah, A. E. (2007). Effects of hydrophilic polymer on the survival of buttonwood seedlings grown under drought stress. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 30(1), 53–66. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/01904160601054973

Barchuk, A. H., & Díaz, M. P. (2000). Vigor de crecimiento y supervivencia de plantaciones de Aspidosperma quebracho-blanco y de Prosopis chilensis en el Chaco árido. Quebracho, 8, 17–29. http://fcf.unse.edu.ar/archivos/quebracho/q8_02-Barchuk.pdf

Barón, C. A., Barrera, R. I. X., Boada, E. L. F., & Rodríguez, N. G. (2007). Evaluación de hidrogeles para aplicaciones agroforestales. Ingeniería e Investigación, 27(3), 35–44. http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=64327305

Bezerra, N. E., Santos, R., Pessoa, P., Andrade, P., Oliveira, S., & Mendonça, I. (2010). Tratamento de espuma fenólica para produção de mudas de alface. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Agrárias, 5(3), 418–422. http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=119016971022

Chirino, E., Vilagrosa, A., & Vallejo, V. R. (2011). Using hydrogel and clay to improve the water status of seedlings for dryland restoration. Plant and Soil, 344(1-2), 99 –110. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-011-0730-1

Chugh, S., Guha, S., & Rao, I. U. (2009). Micropropagation of orchids: A review on the potential of different explants. Scientia Horticulturae, 122(4), 507–520. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2009.07.01

Comisión Nacional Forestal (CONAFOR), Colegio de Postgraduados (COLPOS), & Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales (SEMARNAT). (2008). Reforestación. Evaluación externa ejercicio fiscal 2007. http://www.era-mx.org/biblio/Evaluacion_Colpos_Reforestacion_2007.pdf

Cornejo, O. D. H., & Emmingham, W. (2003). Effects of water stress on seedling growth, water potential and stomatal conductance of four Pinus species. Crop Research & Research on crops, 25(1), 159–190. http://cropresearch.org/volume-25-number-1-january-2003/

da Silva, M. P. H., Kager, D., de Moraes, G. J. L., & Gonçalves, A. N. (2012). Produção de mudas clonais de eucalipto em espuma fenólica: crescimento inicial e mortalidade. CERNE, 18(4), 639–649. http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=74424807014

De la O-Quezada, G. A., Ojeda-Barrios, D. L., Hernández-Rodríguez, O. A., Sánchez-Chávez, E., & Martínez-Tellez, J. (2011). Biomasa, prolina y parámetros nitrogenados en plántulas de nogal bajo estrés hídrico y fertilización nitrogenada. Revista Chapingo Serie Horticultura, 17(1), 13–18. http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1027-152X2011000400003

Farrell, C., Ang, X. Q., & Rayner, J. P. (2013). Water-retention additives increase plant available water in green roof substrates. Ecological Engineering, 52, 112–118. doi: https://doi.org/doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2012.12.098

Gardziella, A., Pilato, L. A., & Knop, A. (2000). Phenolic resins: Chemistry, applications, standardization, safety and ecology. New York, USA: Springer.

Hanjra, M. A., & Qureshi, M. E. (2010). Global water crisis and future food security in an era of climate change. Food Policy, 35(5), 365–377. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2010.05.006

Maldonado-Benitez, K., Aldrete, A., López-Upton, J., Vaquera-Huerta, H., & Cetina-Alcalá, V. M. (2011). Producción de Pinus greggii Engelm. en mezclas de sustrato con hidrogel y riego en vivero. Agrociencia, 45(3), 389–398. Retrieved from http://www.scielo.org.mx/pdf/agro/v45n3/v45n3a11.pdf

Orikiriza, L. J. B., Agaba, H., Eilu, G., Kabasa, J. D., Worbes, M., & Hüttermann, A. (2013). Effects of hydrogels on tree seedling performance in temperate soils before and after water stress. Journal of Environmental Protection, 04(07), 713–721. doi: https://doi.org/10.4236/jep.2013.47082

Palacios, R. A., Rodríguez, L. R., Prieto, G. F., Meza, R. J., Razo, Z. R., & Hernández, F. M. L. (2015). Supervivencia de Pinus leiophylla Schiede ex Schltdl. et Cham. en campo mediante la aplicación de espuma fenólica hidratada. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Forestales, 6(32), 83–92. http://cienciasforestales.inifap.gob.mx/editorial/index.php/Forestales/article/view/4127/3477

Schlegel, B., Gayoso, J., & Guerra, J. (2000). Manual de procedimientos. Muestreos de biomasa forestal. http://www.uach.cl/procarbono/pdf/manuales/guia_destructivo.pdf

Sigala, R. J. Á., González, T. M. A., & Jiménez, P. J. (2015). Análisis de supervivencia para una reforestación con Pinus pseudostrobus Lindl . en el sur de Nuevo León. Ciencia UANL, 18(75), 61–66. http://cienciauanl.uanl.mx/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/art.-del-pino.pdf

Velázquez, A., Durán, E., Mas, J. F., Bray, D., & Bocco, G. (2005). Situación actual y prospectiva del cambio de la cubierta vegetal y usos del suelo en México. In Consejo Nacional de Población (CONAPO) (Ed.), México ante los desafíos de desarrollo del milenio (pp. 391–412). México: CONAPO.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2017 Revista Chapingo Serie Ciencias Forestales y del Ambiente