Keywords
grape must quality
leaf area
water potential
phenology
Categories
How to Cite
Abstract
This research was carried out in the municipality of Vallbona de les Monges Lleida, Spain at the L’Olivera Cooperativa winery during the 2013 vegetative cycle. The training systems studied were LYS (constituted by an ascending and a descending monoplane) and ascending monoplane (AM). Impact on training system on yield and grape (Vitis vinifera L.) Var. “Macabeu” must quality, agronomic performance, canopy structure, water potential, yield components and must quality, among other variables, was evaluated. A single classification analysis of variance and comparison of means with Tukey’s test were performed. Plants of the LYS system had a greater total exposed leaf area (TELA) of 18 153.5 m2∙ha-1, a lower number of leaf layers (NCH, 2.4), greater exposure of grape clusters than MA. Shoot percentage was 97 %, yield 31.72 t-ha-1, and 11.6 probable alcohol content. These variables had significant statistical differences (P<0.05). The MA system had a TELA 50 % lower than LYS, higher NCH by 16.77 % and greater shading of the clusters: a shoot percentage of 99 %. The LYS system had a higher probable alcohol content, lower fruit acidity, lower grape weight, and higher number of clusters. In conclusion, the training system influences must quality and yield, and the LYS system showed better results.
References
AEMET (Agencia Estatal de Meteorología, Ministerio de Agricultura Alimentación y Medio Ambiente) (2014). Servicios climáticos. GOBIERNO DE ESPAÑA. [EN LINEA]: http://www.aemet.es/es/serviciosclimaticos/datosclimatologicos/valoresclimatologicos?l=9771Cyk=cat. [FECHA]: 20 de febrero del 2014.
Arfelli, G., Marangoni, B., Amati, A., & Castellari, M. (1996). The effects of cluster thinning on some ripening parameters and wine quality. In: Workshop strategies to optimize wine grape quality. Acta Horticulturae, 27, 379‒386.
Arora N. K., Gill M., I. S., & Navjot. (2010). Effects of training system on madurity, yield and quality of grapes cv. Perlette under northern Indian conditions. Haryana Journal Horticultural Science, 39(3-4), 191-192.
Ayala G., A. V., Carrera Ch. B., Schwentesius R. R., Almaguer V. G., Jolalpa B. J. L., & Márquez B. S. R. (2012). Competitividad del sector agropecuario en México: Implicaciones y retos. Ed. Plaza y Valdez. México. 188 p.
Azevedo, M. (2002). Influencia del sistema de conducción en la carga y la productividad de la vid (Vitis vinífera L.), casta Syrah. Relatório de Ingeniería en Agronomía. ISA-UTLisboa, Portugal, 80 pp.
Baggiolini, M. (1952). Les stades repères dans le développement annuel de la vigne et leur utilisation pratique. Revue romande d’Agriculture et d’Arboriculture, 8(1), 4-6.
Borja-Bravo, García-Salazar, Reyes-Muro, & Arellano-Arciniega. (2016). Rentabilidad de los sistemas de producción de uva (Vitis vinífera) para mesa e industria en Aguascalientes, México. AGRICULTURA, SOCIEDAD Y DESARROLLO. 13: 151-168.
Boubals, D. (2001). L ́eclaircissage Manuel dés grappes (vendange en vert). Progrés Agricole et Viticole, 118 (17), 372‒374.
Carbonneau, A. (1991). Créer un mouvemenr d ́évolution de la conduite du vignoble. Revista Viticultura e Enología, 4, 19‒21.
Carboneau, A. (1995). Mise au point d ́un mod`ele de qualité en viticulture. Journées du groupe d ́etude des syst`emes de conduite de la vigne, 1, 119‒124 p.
Deloire A., Carbonneau, A., Federspiel, B., Ojeda, H., Wang, Z. & Constanza P. (2003). La vigne et l ́eau. Progés Agricole et Viticole, 120 (4), 79‒90.
De la Fé, C., Hernández, O., Palacios, J., Palacios, J. A., & González, E. (2001). Desarrollo del cultivo de la vid en el sector campesino-cooperativo del Occidente de Cuba. Cultivos Tropicales, vol. 22, núm. 4, 2001, pp. 43-49.
Falcão, L. D., Chaves E., Burin V. M., Falcão A. P., Gris E. F.,..., Bordignon-Luiz M. T. (2008). Maturity of Cabernet Sauvignon berries from grapevines grown with two different training systems in a new grape growing region in Brazil. Ciencia e Investigación Agraria. 35(3), 271-282.
Fernandes, H. (2004). Inflencia do sistema de condução no comportamento agronómico e ecofisilógico da videira (Vitis vinifera L.), casta Syrah e Touriga Nacional. Relatorio de Ingeniería en Agronomía. ISA- UTLisboa. Lisboa, Portugal, 80 pp.
Ferrer, M., & González, N. G. (2002). Resultados enológicos y productivos de la aplicación de diversas alternativas de raleo de racimos y distintas intensidades de poda invernal en Vitis vinifera L. Cv. Tannat. Agrociencia, 6 (1), 53‒62.
Figueira L. (2004). Influência do intervençoes en verde na ecofisiologia, produçao e qualidade do mosto da casta Touriga Nacional. Relatório de Engenharia Agronómica. ISA-UTLisboa. Lisboa, Portugal, 56pp.
Hidalgo T. J. (2010). Tratado de Enología. Segunda Edición. Ediciones Mundi-Prensa, Madrid, España. 1822 p.
Moragas B., P. (2005). Influència del sistema de conducciò (Arquitectura de la planta i supressió de raims) sobre el compoertamient ecofisiológic i agronòmic de la vinya (Vitis vinifera L.), varietat “syrah”, durante el cicle vegetatiu de 2004 i a la regió de Lisboa (Portugal). Tesis de Ingenieria, Universidad Técnica de Lisboa, Instituto Superior de Agronomia. Lisboa (Portugal).
Mota, T. (2004). Potencialidades e condicionalismos da condução Lys. Tesis de Doctorado, Universidad Tecnológica de Lisboa. Lisboa, Portugal.
Murisier, F., & Zufferey V. (1997). Rapport feuille-fruit de la vigne et qualité du raisin. Revue Suisse de Viticulture, Arboriculture et Horticulture, 29 (6), 355‒362.
International Organization of Vine and Wine. OIV. (1990). Metodologías de evaluación de calidad de vino. Madrid, España. 35P.
OIV (2014). Word Vitinicultural Statistics, 2013-2014. International Organisation of vine and wine. OIV (2020). Wine Production. OIV. First estimates. International Organisation of vine and wine.
Palliotti, A., Tommaso Frioni, Sergio Tombesi, Paolo Sabbatini, Juan Guillermo Cruz-Castillo,...,Stefano Poni. (2017). Double-Pruning Grapevines as a Management Tool to Delay Berry Ripening and Control Yield. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture. 68: 412-421.
Poni, S., Rebucci, B., Magnanini, E., & Intrieri, C. (1996). Preliminary results on the use of a modified point quadrat method for estimating canopy structure on grapevine systems. Vitis, 35 (1), 23-28.
Reynolds A. G., & Vanden H., J. E. (2009). Influence of grapevine training systems on vine grow thand fruit composition: A review. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 60(3), 251‒268.
Reynolds, A. G., Wardle, D. A., Cliff, M. A., & King, M. (2004). Impact of training system and vine spacing on vine performance, berry composition, and wine sensory attributes of seyval and chancello. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 55 (1), 84‒95.
Sadegh, A. S., Ali, E., Zamani, Z. A., Vezvaei, A., Naghavi, M. R., & Talaei, A. R. (2005). Influence of three training systems on fruit yield and quality of five grapevine cultivars. Iranian Journal Horticultural Science Tecnology, 5(4), 189‒200. SAS Institute. (2004). SAS® 9.1 SQL. Procedure User’s Guide. Cary, NC, USA.
Sella J., Espinás, E., Domingo, C., & Minguez, S. (1994). Estudio de los efectos del aclareo de racimos en la variedad Macabeo. Journées du Groupe D ́étude des Systémes de Conduite de la Vigne, 1, 170‒174.
Smart, R. (1985). Principles of grapevine canopy microclimate manipulation with implications for yield and quality. A review. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 36 (3), 230‒239.
Smart, R., & M. Robinson. (1991). Sunlight into wine. A handbook for winegrape canopy management. Winetitles, Underdale. Sydney, Australia. 88 pp.
Tardaguila J., Martínez De Toder, F., Poni, S., & Diago, M. P. (2010). Impact of early leaf removal on yield and fruit and wine composition of Vitis vinifera L. Graciano and Carignan. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 61, 372‒281.
Tesic D., Woolley D. J., Hewett E. W., & Martin D. J. (2001). Environmental effects on cv Cabernet Sauvignon (Vitis vinifera L.) grown in Hawke’s Bay, New Zealand. 1. Phenology and characterisation of viticultural environments. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research 8,15–26,2001
Vanden-Heuvel, J. E., Lerch, E., Lenerz, C. C., Meyers, J. M., & Mansfield A. K. (2013). Training system and vine spacing impact vine growth, yield, and fruit composition in a vigorous young ‘noiret’ vineyard. HortTecnology, 23 (4-5), 505‒510.
Walteros, I. Y., Constanza- Molano, D., Almanza-Merchán, P. J., Camacho-Helber, M., & Balaguera-López, E. (2012). Efecto de la poda sobre la producción y calidad de frutos de Vitis vinifera L. var. Cabernet Sauvignon en Sutamarchán (Boyacá, Colombia). Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolas, 6 (1), 19‒30.
Zsofi, Z., Gal, L., Szilagyi, Z., Szücs, E., Marschall, M.,...,Balo, B. (2009). Use of stomatal conductance and pre-dawn water potential to classify terroir for the grape variety Kékfrankos. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research, 15, 36‒47.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Chapingo Serie Agricultura Tropical