ISSN e: 2007-4018 / ISSN print: 2007-4018

English | Español

     

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Vol. XXIV, issue 1 January - April 2018

ISSN: ppub: 2007-3828 epub: 2007-4018

Scientific note

Growth of Leucaena leucocephala (Lam.) de Wit biofertilized with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in the nursery

http://dx.doi.org/10.5154/r.rchscfa.2017.07.043

Aguirre-Medina, Juan F. 1 * ; Gálvez-López, Ana L. 1 ; Ibarra-Puón, José C. 1

  • 1Universidad Autónoma de Chiapas, Facultad de Ciencias Agrícolas, Campus IV. Entronque Carretera Costera y Estación Huehuetán km 1. C. P. 30660. Huehuetán, Chiapas, México.

Corresponding author: juanf56@prodigy.net.mx, tel.: 964 627 0128, fax: 964 627 0439

Received: July 12, 2017; Accepted: November 03, 2017

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License view the permissions of this license

Abstract

Introduction:

Leucaena leucocephala (Lam.) de Wit is native to tropical America. The root system of the species is associated with microorganisms that improve nutrition and growth.

Objective:

To evaluate the effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) collections on the phosphorus (P) content and growth of L. leucocephala in the nursery.

Materials and methods:

The seeds were sown and six treatments were applied: Rhizophagus intraradices (Schenck & Sm.) Walker & Schüßler (1), the collections “Caracoles” (2), “Rosario Izapa” (3), “Té limón” (4) and “San Rafael” (5), fertilization 15N-15P-15K (6) and a control. Morphological and physiological variables, root colonization and P content were recorded at 120 days. Data were subjected to an analysis of variance and Tukey’s range test (P ≤ 0.05).

Results and discussion:

AMF improved plant characteristics in comparison with the control and fertilization. Rhizophagus intraradices caused the highest growth values in the aerial part, mycorrhizal colonization and P content, and the lowest growth in the root system. The "Caracoles" and "Rosario Izapa" isolates promoted height, root biomass and P content higher than “Té limón” and “San Rafael”.

Conclusion:

AMF allow decreasing chemical fertilization without detriment to the growth of L. leucocephala.

Keywords:Arbuscular mycorrhizae; biofertilization; phosphorus; Rhizophagus intraradices

Introduction

Leucaena leucocephala (Lam.) de Wit is distributed in the tropics and subtropics (Yeung, Wong, & Wong, 2002) and has great biological diversity in Mexico (Grether, Martínez-Bernal, Luckow, & Zárate, 2006). The plant is fast-growing (Tewari, Katiyar, Ram, & Misra, 2004) and is used in the reforestation of eroded areas and for other purposes in various production systems (Wencomo & Lugo, 2013).

The species L. leucocephala easily adapts to different environments, probably due to the ability of the root system to establish symbiosis with diverse microorganisms, if one takes into account that the vegetation can be linked to the development of the underground community (Sanon et al., 2009). Among them are arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF), which influence the growth of plants through the transport of nutrients, especially phosphorus; in addition, they promote the absorption of minor elements (Smith, Anderson, & Smith, 2015), trigger defense mechanisms against pathogens (Jaizme-Vega & Rodríguez-Romero, 2008) and improve tolerance to adverse environmental conditions (Doubková, Vlasáková, & Sudová, 2013). AMF can be found in all terrestrial ecosystems; their universality implies vast taxonomic diversity (Jaizme-Vega, 2009). Native AMF populations have favored the sustainability of agricultural systems, while other introduced AMF may not adapt to the environment and present ecological specificity (Serralde & Ramírez 2004) or preference for the host (Daniell, Husband, Fitter, & Young, 2001). In the rhizosphere, in addition to microorganisms, there are abundant root exudates that have a selective effect on the soil microbiota (Offre et al., 2007).

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of different collections of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi from southeastern Mexico on the growth and phosphorus (P) content of L. leucocephala.

Materials and methods

The research was carried out under nursery conditions during the spring of 2015 in the Experimental Field of the Faculty of Agricultural Sciences C-IV in Huehuetán, Chiapas. The nursery is located at coordinates 15° 00´ NL and 94° 30´ WL at 44 masl. The area has an Am(w’’)ig climate, according to (1973). Mean annual rainfall is 2 326 mm and average annual temperature is 25.4 °C, according to García (1973).

The seed of L. leucocephala cv. Perú was harvested from a 10-year-old plantation in the Miguel Alemán neighborhood, municipality of Pijijiapan, Chiapas (15° 19’ NL - 92° 33’ WL). Four AMF isolates were collected in three tropical regions of Mexico. Two of them, “Caracoles” (Tenampulco, Puebla: 20° 08´ 30´´ NL and 97° 30´ 00´´ WL at 350 masl, 2 100 mm of precipitation and Regosol soils) and “San Rafael” (San Rafael, Veracruz: 20° 08´ 20´´ NL and 97° 02´ 57´´ WL at 20 masl, 1 600 mm of precipitation and Cambisol soils) were obtained from soil cultivated with Vanilla planifolia Andrews. The other two, “Rosario Izapa”, associated with Theobroma cacao L., and “Té limón”, associated with Coffea arabica L., were obtained in the Soconusco region of Chiapas (Tuxtla Chico, Chiapas: 14° 30´ NL and 92° 00´ WL at 425 masl, 4 252 mm of precipitation and Luvisol soils). These isolates were evaluated because their initial capacity to induce greater growth of the host plant during the multiplication stage has been observed. In addition to the above, Rhizophagus intraradices (Schenck & Sm.) Walker & Schüßler was evaluated, as a reference fungus, at a concentration of 40 spores·g-1 of soil and 95 % root colonization in the host plant Brachiaria brizantha (Hochst. ex. A. Rich.) (Data contained in the Micorriza INIFAP® product. This AMF has been used in the biofertilizer induction program for various annual and perennial crops in Mexico (Aguirre-Medina, 2006).

In the roots collected, the presence of AMF was verified by staining and clearing (Phillips & Hayman, 1970). In each soil sample, the spores were separated into groups, by wet sieving and decanting, in order to multiply the similar fungi (Gerdemann & Nicolson, 1963), according to the color, shape and size observed in a stereomicroscope. Spores with similar characteristics were propagated for 90 days in a sterilized river sand substrate (in 1-L containers), using sorghum as a host plant. At harvest, at least 100 spores·g-1 of soil with 93 % root colonization were achieved.

The substrate used in the research was obtained in the grounds of the same experimental field, at a depth of 0 to 30 cm in soils of the eutric Fluvisol group (Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Geografía e Informática [INEGI], 2005). The substrate was mixed with river sand previously washed and sieved at a ratio of 1:1 (v/v). The final substrate had the following components and characteristics: sand (82.7 %), silt (14.3 %), clay (4.16 %), crumby sand texture, organic matter (2.8 %), pH 5.5, N (0.12 %), P (5.0 ppm), cation exchange capacity (CEC: 4.12 mg·100 g-1) and electrical conductivity (EC: 0.12 dS·m-1). Using this substrate, 5-kg bags were filled, perforated at the bottom to favor drainage and placed on iron terraces. Irrigation was carried out every other day.

The AMF were adhered to the L. leucocephala seeds with carboxymethylcellulose; the inoculum represented 6 % of the seed weight. The seeds were sown in pots, 3 cm deep, according to the following treatments: R. intraradices, “Caracoles”, “Rosario Izapa”, “Té limón”, “San Rafael”, fertilization with 15N-15P-15K and a control. The treatments were distributed in a completely randomized design with four repetitions.

The morphological variables (plant height, stem diameter, number of leaves and root colonization) and physiological variables (dry biomass of the root, stem and leaf) were recorded at 120 days after sowing (das). The height was obtained with a tape measure, from the root crown to the apical bud, and stem diameter was measured with a digital Vernier caliper (AutoTECTM, China), 5 cm away from the root crown to the apex. Mycorrhizal colonization (%) was determined in 100 root segments per treatment, with a length of 1.5 to 1.6 cm; they were prepared using the staining and clearing technique of Phillips and Hayman (1970) and were observed under a microscope with oil immersion objective (100x). On the other hand, the dry matter of the aerial and radical part was determined in a forced-air oven at temperatures of 75 to 80 °C for 72 h; subsequently, each component was weighed (Ohaus, Adventurer Pro, USA). With these variables, the quality index proposed by Dickson, Leaf, and Hosner (1960) was determined. Finally, the P content was quantified in a spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific Model 400 ¼, USA).

The effects between treatments were determined through an analysis of variance for each variable with the PROC ANOVA procedure. Subsequently, Tukey’s range test (P ≤ 0.05) was performed using SAS computer software version 8.1 (Statistical Analysis System [SAS], 1999-2000).

Results and discussion

Table 1 shows the growth variables of L. leucocephala plants with the treatments applied. Plant height was statistically different among them (P ≤ 0.05); the maximum was 128 cm with the "Caracoles" collection and the increases were 15 % (19 cm) in relation to the control and 8.6 % (16 cm) compared to the fertilized treatment. The "Caracoles", "Rosario Izapa" and “Té limón” isolates were statistically similar with R. intraradices, with an average height of 124 ± 1.9 cm. In other perennial species such as T. cacao, Aguirre-Medina, Mendoza-López, Cadena-Iñiguez, and Avendaño-Arrazate (2007) report 9 cm more height in plants inoculated with R. intraradices compared to the control at 120 das.

Table 1. Morphological and physiological components of Leucaena leucocephala inoculated with different arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in the nursery. Results at 120 days after sowing.

Treatment Height (cm) Diameter (mm) Number of leaves Dry weight (g·plant-1) DQI
Leaves Stem Root
Rhizophagus intraradices 123 ± 1.3 ab 9.1 ± 0.0 a 37 ± 0.8 a 16.08 ± 0.5 a 15.76 ± 0.5 a 10.49 ± 0.5 c 2.27
Caracoles 128 ± 2.7 a 7.3 ± 0.4 b 24 ± 0.9 b 10.19 ± 0.3 b 12.42 ± 0.6 b 13.95 ± 0.7 ab 1.80
Rosario Izapa 126 ± 3.2 ab 7.3 ± 0.2 b 21 ± 0.8 bc 14.17 ± 0.4 a 11.32 ± 0.6 bc 14.64 ± 0.6 a 1.87
Té limón 119 ± 3.3 abc 7.0 ± 0.1 b 18 ± 0.4 c 9.05 ± 0.7 bc 9.86 ± 0.1 bcd 11.87 ± 0.2 bc 1.68
San Rafael 86 ± 2.2 d 7.0 ± 0.2 b 24 ± 1.4 b 8.00 ± 0.3 bc 7.89 ± 0.9 d 9.99 ± 0.5 c 2.08
15N-15P-15K 112 ± 4.3 bc 6.7 ± 0.1 b 19 ± 1.1 c 8.56 ± 0.6 bc 8.98 ± 0.3 cd 12.60 ± 0.9 abc 1.57
Control 109 ± 3.6 c 6.8 ± 0.1 b 19 ± 0.5 c 7.80 ± 0.3 c 8.48 ± 0.4 d 12.31 ± 0.3 abc 1.56
CV (%) 5.4 7.5 8.0 9.6 9.3 9.7
CV: coefficient of variation. DQI: Dickson quality index. Values with the same letter within each column are equal according to the Tukey test (P ≤ 0.05).

In the case of stem diameter, the plants inoculated with R. intraradices were 25 % higher (P ≤ 0.05) than those of the control and fertilized treatment, and 21 % higher than those inoculated with the AMF collected. In other plants inoculated with R. intraradices such as Cedrela odorata L. and Coffea canephora (Pierre) ex Froehner, the increase was 8 and 20 %, respectively, with respect to the control (Aguirre-Medina, Mina-Briones, Cadena-Iñiguez, Dardón-Zunun, & Hernández-Sedas, 2014; Ibarra-Puón, Aguirre-Medina, Ley-De Coss, Cadena-Iñiguez, & Zavala-Mata, 2014). With other AMF such as Glomus fasciculatum (Thaxter) Gerdemann & Trappe inoculated in Tectona grandis L. F. and Astronium graveolens Jacq., the increase in stem diameter was 11.8 % compared to the control (Hernández & Salas, 2009).

Regarding the number of leaves, R. intraradices induced 18 more leaves than the control and fertilized treatment, and 14 more than the AMF collected (P ≤ 0.05). On average, the isolates induced two leaves more than the control and the treatment with chemical fertilization. In T. cacao inoculated with R. intraradices, the plants had four more leaves than the control (Aguirre-Medina et al., 2007), and the C. canephora plants had two more leaves with the same endomycorrhizal fungus in soil-sand as a substrate (Ibarra-Puón et al., 2014). The number of leaves increased in mycorrhized plants, with the exception of “Té limón”, possibly due to the greater nutrient absorption capacity (Leigh, Hodge, & Fitter, 2009), which induces increased photosynthetic activity after colonization, as in the case of bean (Aguirre-Medina, Kohashi-Shibata, Trejo-López, Acosta Gallegos, & Cadena-Iñiguez, 2005).

Leaf biomass production showed statistical difference (P ≤ 0.05) among treatments and the highest increase was recorded with the inoculation of the reference AMF R. intraradices. Among the fungi collected, "Rosario Izapa" decreased the dry matter allocation to the leaves by 11 % compared to R. intraradices, although statistically they were similar; however, the decrease was greater in the other isolates, on the order of 36 and 46 % for “Caracoles” and “Té limón”, respectively, and 46 % for “San Rafael” and the fertilized control. The results indicate that the accumulation of dry matter in the biomass of the leaf varies according to the isolate applied. Moora, Öpik, Sen, and Zobel (2004) point out variations in mycorrhization, nutrient uptake and plant productivity based on the interaction between plant species and AMF.

Stem dry weight also increased with R. intraradices and was statistically superior (P ≤ 0.05) to the rest of the treatments. Among the isolates collected, a differential response was presented. "Caracoles" and "Rosario Izapa" allocated 24 % less biomass to the stem compared to R. intraradices, while in “Té limón”, “San Rafael”, the control and the fertilized treatment, the decrease was 43 %. Doubková et al. (2013) showed that inoculation with AMF, in species of agricultural interest, increases the nutrition and growth of the plant, and allows it to overcome situations of biotic and abiotic stress. This background suggests the contrasting functionality of microorganisms in interaction with plants (Jäderlund, Arthurson, Granhall, & Jansson, 2008), as in the response found with L. leucocephala.

With regard to root biomass, there was a differential response among the isolates; the largest increase was recorded in “Caracoles” and “Rosario Izapa”. In relation to these two treatments, the biomass decreased 28 % in R. intraradices and “San Rafael”, and 15 % in the control and fertilized treatments. In C. arabica, R. intraradices induced lower root biomass compared to the control (Aguirre-Medina et al., 2011), but in C. odorata it increased (Aguirre-Medina et al., 2014). The decrease in the root biomass seems to be replaced by the hyphae of the fungus (Azcón & Barea, 1980); otherwise, it would be expected that treatments with a greater root system, such as those inoculated with the native and control collections, would have higher absorption of soil nutrients, but in this case the opposite happened with P, as observed in Figure 1.

The root-shoot ratio of L. leucocephala was modified with the biofertilization of some AMF under nursery conditions (Figure 1). The root system of L. leucocephala inoculated with R. intraradices represented 28.4 % of the total biomass, being the lowest percentage compared to the rest of the treatments (between 35 and 37 %). By contrast, in the case of aerial biomass, R. intraradices accounted for 71.6 %. In the rest of the treatments, the value fluctuated from 63 to 65 %. The above effect influences the determination of the plant quality index proposed by Dickson et al. (1960).

Figure 1. Aerial/root biomass ratio of Leucaena leucocephala inoculated with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. The values are averages of four repetitions per treatment.

Kanno et al. (2006) evaluated native isolates of endomycorrhizal fungi in Brazil and found increases in aerial and root biomass in Brachiaria decumbens Stapf, B. brizantha (Hochst. ex A. Rich.) Stapf and Panicum maximun Jacq., but not in B. humidicola (Rendle) Schweick.

With respect to root colonization, the highest value was obtained with R. intraradices (78%), while the lowest (61%) was found in the control. This confirms the presence of other mycorrhizal fungi in the substrate used, but with less ability to stimulate the growth of Leucaena. These results confirm the colonization capacity of R. intraradices, as has also happened in other annual and perennial crops (Aguirre-Medina, Aguirre-Cadena, Cadena-Iñiguez, & Avendaño-Arrazate, 2012). As for the collections, the average colonization was: Caracoles (68 %), Rozario Izapa (72 %), Té limón (77 %) and San Rafael (63 %). These fungi, when introduced adhered to the seed, have a greater chance of colonization when the radicle emerges, unlike the fungi that are present in the substrate but may not be in the same vicinity. It is likely that colonization by native fungi occurs, but its effect is assumed in the ability to influence the growth of the host plant and the transport of P.

Figure 2 shows that the P content in L. leucocephala was statistically higher (P ≤ 0.05) in the treatment with R. intraradices. Plants in symbiosis with mycorrhizal fungi absorb P from the soil more efficiently than non-colonized plants (Aguirre-Medina et al., 2011; Kanno et al., 2006). Based on the results, AMF inoculated in L. leucocephala allow decreasing chemical fertilization in the nursery, without detriment to plant growth.

Figure 2. Variation in phosphorus content in the plant tissue of Leucaena leucocephala inoculated with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Results at 120 days after sowing. Different letters indicate statistically significant differences according to the Tukey test (P ≤ 0.05). The vertical bars indicate the standard error of the mean (n = 4). Coefficient of variation = 3.7 %.

Conclusions

The morphological and physiological performance components of Leucaena leucocephala were modified in interaction with the isolates collected, but they maintained a similar proportion in the shoot-root ratio. Biofertilization with Rhizophagus intraradices promoted greater plant growth of L. leucocephala in the aerial part, lower in the root system and higher phosphorus content. With regard to endomycorrhizal fungi, "Caracoles", "Rosario Izapa" and “Té limón” increased the P content in the plant tissue compared to the control and fertilized treatment. The "Caracoles" and "Rosario Izapa" collections are good candidates as biofertilizers in perennial species. Based on the results obtained, AMF in L. leucocephala can help reduce chemical fertilization in the nursery, without detriment to plant growth.

References

Aguirre-Medina, J. F. (2006). Biofertilizantes microbianos: Experiencias agronómicas del programa nacional del INIFAP en México. México: Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias - Centro de Investigaciones Regionales Pacífico Sur - Campo Experimental Rosario Izapa. Retrieved from http://biblioteca.inifap.gob.mx:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/3633

Aguirre-Medina, J. F., Aguirre-Cadena, J. F., Cadena-Iñiguez, J., & Avendaño-Arrazate, C. H. (2012). Biofertilización en plantas de la selva húmeda tropical (1.a ed.). México: Colegio de Postgraduados.

Aguirre-Medina, J. F., Kohashi-Shibata, J., Trejo-López, C., Acosta Gallegos, J. A., & Cadena-Iñiguez, J. (2005). Inoculación de Phaseolus vulgaris L. con tres microorganismos y su efecto en tolerancia a sequía. Agricultura Técnica en México, 31, 125-137. Retrieved from http://www.redalyc.org/toc.oa?id=608&numero=10078

Aguirre-Medina, J. F., Mendoza-López, A., Cadena-Iñiguez, J., & Avendaño-Arrazate, C. H. (2007). La biofertilización del cacao (Theobroma cacao L.) en vivero con Azospirillum brasilense Tarrand, Krieg et Döbereiner y Glomus intraradices Schenk et Smith. Interciencia, 32(8), 1-6. Retrieved from http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=33932808

Aguirre-Medina, J. F., Mina-Briones, F., Cadena-Iñiguez, O. J., Dardón-Zunun, J. D., & Hernández-Sedas, D. A. (2014). Crecimiento de Cedrela odorata L. biofertilizada con Rhizophagus intraradices y Azospirillum brasilense en vivero. Revista Chapingo Serie Ciencias Forestales y del Ambiente, 20(3), 177-186. doi: 10.5154/r.rchscfa.2014.01.001

Aguirre-Medina, J. F., Moroyoqui-Ovilla, D. M., Mendoza-López, A., Cadena-Iñiguez, J., Avendaño-Arrazate, C. H., & Aguirre-Cadena, J. F. (2011). Aplicación de A. brasilense y G. intraradices a Coffea arabica en vivero. Agronomía Mesoamericana, 22(1), 1-10. Retrieved from http://www.mag.go.cr/rev_meso/v22n01_071.pdf

Azcón, G. C., & Barea, J. M. (1980). Micorrizas. Investigación y Ciencia, 47, 8-16.

Daniell, T., Husband, J. R., Fitter, A. H., & Young, J. P. W. (2001). Molecular diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi colonizing arable crops. FEMS Microbiology Ecology 36(2-3), 203-209. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2001.tb00841.x

Dickson, A., Leaf, A. L., & Hosner, J. F. (1960). Quality appraisal of white spruce and white pine seedling stock in nurseries. Forestry Chronicle, 36, 10-13. Retrieved from http://pubs.cif-ifc.org/doi/pdf/10.5558/tfc36010-1

Doubková, P., Vlasáková, E., & Sudová, R. (2013). Arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis alleviates drought stress imposed on Knautia arvensis plants in serpentine soil. Plant Soil, 370, 149-161. doi: 10.1007/s11104-013-1610-7

García, A. E. (1973). Modificaciones al sistema de clasificación climática de Köppen para adaptarlas a las condiciones de la república mexicana (3a ed.). México. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.

Gerdemann, J. W., & Nicolson, T. H. (1963). Spores of mycorrhizal Endogone species extracted from the soil by wet sieving and decanting. Transactions of the British Mycological Society, 46(2), 235-244. doi: 10.1016/S0007-1536(63)80079-0

Grether, R., Martínez-Bernal, A., Luckow, M., & Zárate, S. (2006). Fascículo 44, Mimosaceae. In A. Novelo-Retana, R. Medina-Lemos, H. Ochoterena-Booth, G. A. Salazar-Chávez, & L. O. Alvarado-Cárdenas (Eds.), Flora del Valle de Tehuacán-Cuicatlán (1.a ed., pp. 1-108). México: UNAM. Retrieved from http://www.conabio.gob.mx/malezasdemexico/mimosaceae/leucaena-leucocephala/fichas/ficha.htm

Hernández, W., & Salas, E. (2009). La inoculación con Glomus fasciculatum en el crecimiento de cuatro especies forestales en vivero y campo. Agronomía Costarricense, 33(1), 17-30. Retrieved from https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/agrocost/article/view/6732

Ibarra-Puón, J. C., Aguirre-Medina, J. F., Ley-De Coss, A., Cadena-Iñiguez, J., & Zavala-Mata, A. (2014). Inoculación de Coffea canephora (Pierre) ex Froehner con Rhizophagus intraradices (Schenck et Sm.) Walker et Schuessler y Azospirillum brasilense Tarrand, Krieg et Döbereiner en vivero. Revista Chapingo Serie Horticultura, 20(2), 201-213. doi: 10.5154/r.rchsh.2013.09.027

Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Geografía e Informática (INEGI). (2005). Marco geoestadístico municipal, versión 3.1. Prontuario de información geográfica municipal de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos. Retrieved from http://www3.inegi.org.mx/sistemas/mexicocifras/datos-geograficos/21/21158.pdf

Jäderlund, L., Arthurson, V., Granhall, U., & Jansson, J. K. (2008). Specific interactions between arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and plant growth-promoting bacteria: as revealed by different combinations. FEMS Microbiol Letters, 287(2),174-180. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2008.01318.x

Jaizme-Vega, M. C. (2009). Las micorrizas. Una simbiosis de interés para la agricultura. Revista Vida Rural, 288, 40-52. Retrieved from http://www.mapama.gob.es/ministerio/pags/Biblioteca/Revistas/pdf_Vrural%2FVrural_2009_288_48_52.pdf

Jaizme-Vega, M. C., & Rodríguez-Romero, A. S. (2008). Integración de microorganismos benéficos (Hongos micorrícicos y bacterias rizosféricas) en agrosistemas de las Islas Canarias. Agroecología, 3, 33-39. Retrieved from http://revistas.um.es/agroecologia/article/view/95491/91801

Kanno, T., Saito, M., Ando, Y., Macedo, M. C. M., Nakamura, T., & Miranda, C. H. B. (2006). Importance of indigenous arbuscular mycorrhiza for growth and phosphorus uptake in tropical forage grasses growing on an acid, infertile soil from the Brazilian savannas. Tropical Grasslands, 40, 94-101. Retrieved from http://www.tropicalgrasslands.info/public/journals/4/Historic/Tropical%20Grasslands%20Journal%20archive/PDFs/Vol_40_2006/Vol_40_02_20

Leigh, J., Hodge, A., & Fitter, A. H. (2009). Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi can transfer substantial amounts of nitrogen to their host plant from organic material. New Phytologist, 181, 199-207. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02630.x

Moora, M., Öpik, M., Sen, R., & Zobel, M. (2004). Native arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities differentially influence the seedling performance of rare and common Pulsatilla species. Functional Ecology, 18(4), 554-562. doi: 10.1111/j.0269-8463.2004.00876.x

Offre, P., Pivato, B., Siblot, S., Gamalero, E., Corberand, T., Lemanceau, P., & Mougel, C. (2007). Identification of bacterial groups preferentially associated with mycorrhizal roots of Medicago truncatula. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 73, 913-921. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02042-06

Phillips, J. M., & Hayman, D. J. (1970). Improved procedures for clearing and staining parasitic and vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi for rapid assessment of infection. Transactions of the British Mycological Society, 55, 158-161.

Sanon, A., Andrianjaka, Z. N., Prin, Y., Bally, R., Thioulouse, J., Comte, G., & Duponnois, R. (2009). Rhizosphere microbiota interfere with plant-plant interactions. Plant Soil, 321, 259-278. doi: 10.1007/s11104-009-0010-5

Serralde, O. A. M., & Ramírez, G. M. M. (2004). Análisis de poblaciones de micorrizas en maíz Zea mays cultivado en suelos ácidos bajo diferentes tratamientos agronómicos. Revista Corpoica, 5(1), 31-40. Retrieved from http://corpomail.corpoica.org.co/BACFILES/BACDIGITAL/48629/48629.pdf

Smith, S., Anderson, I., & Smith, F. (2015). Mycorrhizal associations and phosphorus acquisition: From cells to ecosystems. In W. C. Plaxton, & H. Lambers (Eds.), Annual plant reviews volume 48: Phosphorus metabolism in plants (pp. 409-440). USA: John Wiley & Sons. doi: 10.1002/9781118958841.ch14

Statistical Analysis System (SAS). (1999-2000). SAS/STAT user´s Guide: version 8.1. Cary NC, USA: Author.

Tewari, S. K., Katiyar, R. S., Ram, B., & Misra, P. N. (2004). Effect of age and season of harvesting on the growth, coppicing characteristics and biomass productivity of Leucaena leucocephala and Vitex negundo. Biomass and Bioenergy, 26, 229-234. doi: 10.1016/S0961-9534(03)00118-1

Wencomo, H. B., & Lugo, J. (2013). Rendimiento de materia seca y otros componentes en Leucaena leucocephala cv. Cunningham con el uso del Liplant. Pastos y Forrajes, 36(1), 43-49. Retrieved from http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=269127587004

Yeung, P. K. K., Wong, F. T. W., & Wong, J. T. Y. (2002). Mimosine the allelochemical from the leguminous tree L. leucocephala, selectively enhances cell proliferation in dinoflagellates. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 68, 5160-5163. doi: 10.1128/AEM.68.10.5160-5163.2002

Figures:

Figure 1. Aerial/root biomass ratio of Leucaena leucocephala inoculated with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. The values are averages of four repetitions per treatment.
Figure 2. Variation in phosphorus content in the plant tissue of Leucaena leucocephala inoculated with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Results at 120 days after sowing. Different letters indicate statistically significant differences according to the Tukey test (P ≤ 0.05). The vertical bars indicate the standard error of the mean (n = 4). Coefficient of variation = 3.7 %.

Tables:

Table 1. Morphological and physiological components of Leucaena leucocephala inoculated with different arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in the nursery. Results at 120 days after sowing.
Treatment Height (cm) Diameter (mm) Number of leaves Dry weight (g·plant-1) DQI
Leaves Stem Root
Rhizophagus intraradices 123 ± 1.3 ab 9.1 ± 0.0 a 37 ± 0.8 a 16.08 ± 0.5 a 15.76 ± 0.5 a 10.49 ± 0.5 c 2.27
Caracoles 128 ± 2.7 a 7.3 ± 0.4 b 24 ± 0.9 b 10.19 ± 0.3 b 12.42 ± 0.6 b 13.95 ± 0.7 ab 1.80
Rosario Izapa 126 ± 3.2 ab 7.3 ± 0.2 b 21 ± 0.8 bc 14.17 ± 0.4 a 11.32 ± 0.6 bc 14.64 ± 0.6 a 1.87
Té limón 119 ± 3.3 abc 7.0 ± 0.1 b 18 ± 0.4 c 9.05 ± 0.7 bc 9.86 ± 0.1 bcd 11.87 ± 0.2 bc 1.68
San Rafael 86 ± 2.2 d 7.0 ± 0.2 b 24 ± 1.4 b 8.00 ± 0.3 bc 7.89 ± 0.9 d 9.99 ± 0.5 c 2.08
15N-15P-15K 112 ± 4.3 bc 6.7 ± 0.1 b 19 ± 1.1 c 8.56 ± 0.6 bc 8.98 ± 0.3 cd 12.60 ± 0.9 abc 1.57
Control 109 ± 3.6 c 6.8 ± 0.1 b 19 ± 0.5 c 7.80 ± 0.3 c 8.48 ± 0.4 d 12.31 ± 0.3 abc 1.56
CV (%) 5.4 7.5 8.0 9.6 9.3 9.7
CV: coefficient of variation. DQI: Dickson quality index. Values with the same letter within each column are equal according to the Tukey test (P ≤ 0.05).